Posted on 08/24/2006 5:01:36 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
I would he would say what 'half" he would sacrifice. Then maybe "that half" would revolt and run all the mullahs and him in the ground.
Try all.
Which half? Perhaps those that don't agree with him?
Sounds like they interviewed a bunch of liberal Israelis for this story.
Poor guy shouldn't have to settle for half. We can exterminate every Iranian vermin on the face of the earth! Let us help! Please!
LOL. He won't have to. He and his missiles will be gone before he gets the chance.
I'd say he's gonna get 9/10th and not destroy Israel.
Lebanon thinks they got a good trade for some dead jews
And that is exactly what Iran wants.
Iran might then complete its nuclear drive and, branding Israel a preemptive aggressor, claim legitimacy for a strike of its own at Israel.
More blather, Iran has already labeled Israel an occupying
force that must be driven into the sea, what more legitimacy
could they need.
So we can strike now and perhaps fail, or we can wait for
Iran to strike and perhaps succeed. Some choice!
Please, please, let ME push the button!!!
"not" s/b "Note". Arrrrgh.
I was thinking the same thing. The half that this crazy little bastid would scarifice better get their act together and get rid of "Little Hitler" and the Mullah.
Utter horsefeathers. An armored corps in downtown Teheran would stop it cold. So would a hundred nukes. Nobody here is remotely serious, they think "military action" means firing a few cruise missiles at empty tents. That is exactly the silly poll driven substitute for military thinking that got us 9-11, in the case of Afghanistan. Grown ups took the whole country in a few weeks, instead.
and a strange trilling sound was heard.
Substitute "Ahmadinejad" for "Democrats", "Iran" for "America" and "Israel" for "Bush"
Either way the Headline is about on target.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
Go for it you sick little twirp.
The Krauts and the Japs tried in the 1940's and history has a way of repeating itself.
Tehran doesn't rhymne with Hiroshima or Nagasaki but the effect would be the same.
"Sounds like they interviewed a bunch of liberal Israelis for this story."
Right, 'cause the conservatives would have said "all."
Ah, he'd sacrifice ALL of Iran and little Eddies like me would visit the nearest mosque to...protest...If you know whay Im sayin?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.