Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee
Thank you for the repaly. It is well though out and lucid (which is rare here sometimes)

My major problem is that some people interweave the Old and New Testaments to make their point. Wasn't Jesus supposed to be the new covenent? Guess it boils down to what is uin your heart and spirit that really counts.
247 posted on 08/24/2006 1:30:14 PM PDT by newcats (Natural Born Skeptic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: newcats
Wasn't Jesus supposed to be the new covenent?

Yes, He is the New Covenant.

What writings did He quote when He taught?

People do improperly merge the old and new. They are often people who are trying to find the image of the G-d they want rather than the G-d who is. But you can't divorce the new from the old. All the first Christians, as well as Christ Himself, were Torah observant Jews. Christianity could not have been born in any other setting. G-d called Abraham out of everything he had known so G-d could begin to create the people who would birth the Messiah.

It boils down to where your heart is. Is it proud of what you believe, or is it humble before the majesty of G-d? Scripture tells us G-d loves the latter, and has never had much patience for the former. I have found that the humble tend to interpret the Bible in a very similar manner to each other, which is what first knocked me off my religious high horse.

I'm still learning the humility bit and G-d is being more than patient with me. But as I submit my will to His I am finding that I am becoming more and more a fundamentalist.

Shalom.

255 posted on 08/24/2006 1:40:28 PM PDT by ArGee (The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson