I found it and read it. Doesn't change my impression at all. The letter speaks of "classrooms." I must assume that they are not located in the church itself. I must also assume that this woman taught in one of the classrooms. So all of the comments on this thread up to this point on this thread about this preacher not allowing this woman to teach in church are unmitigated BS.
The simple fact is that the letter does nothing to clear-up the "controversy."
Well, "classrooms" are in churches (bible study obviously), public and private schools, businesses and pretty much any room designated to "teach" something. He is speaking of her "teaching" MEN scripture IN HIS church, following his position on scripture.
Actually, his position was solidified by her reaction to the whole situation. Taking it public, bringing harm to the church. Looking for wiggle room in scripture always leaves the person bobbing when they should have weaved!
I agree that going public with the controversy indicates a certain level of underhandedness. I also got the impression that the preacher's letter was written with the assistance of a lawyer. Think about that for a moment . . . it's likely no one is telling the complete truth. The preacher, the teacher, or the press.