Posted on 08/07/2006 1:29:27 PM PDT by JSedreporter
Many people believe that government and business are warring factions, and that political parties typically align with one or the other. But the truth, as Timothy P. Carney points out in his new book, is that big business is often in bed with big government and that both Republicans and Democrats have helped forge a partnership that consistently rips off ordinary Americans.
Carney's new book, The Big Ripoff: How Big Business and Big Government Steal Your Money, exposes this nasty partnership in detailfrom Boeing subsidies to Ethanol mandatesand shows just how taxpayers lose their money and their voice in Washington.
Carney, currently a fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, calls the idea that big business wants a smaller government the big myth, but as a myth it is not borne out by the facts. He explains that even in 1935, New Dealer FDR was seen as an enemy of big business, despite the Chamber of Commerce and other businesses SUPPORT of New Deal expansion.
But the myth persists today. The fall of Enron was called a failure of anarchic capitalism, Carney explains, but really Enron flourished under heavy regulation (which it lobbied for) and constantly asked for government handouts. People viewed the lawsuits against Big Tobacco as a government crusade against big business, but in the book, Carney exposes the intricate settlement agreement that ensures that companies like Phillip Morris USA stay in business and squash their competition, all with the help of the government.
So how is this counterintuitive scenario possible and why should you care?
Carney, a contributing editor for Human Events conservative weekly newspaper, and former political reporter for syndicated columnist Robert Novak, gives you the breakdown of how it happens and gives you reasons to care in Ripoff.
The short answer is that politicians have the power to help or hinder businesses, so businesses come to the source of power to ensure that their profits continue to increase. Its a nasty game, but if companies dont play they lose. Microsoft was rebuked by politicians in Washington several years ago because Bill Gates did not want to play politics, Carney recounts. So now, companies play, and you lose.
You lose, because government action doesn't create wealth--it redistributes it. This means Enrons government-aided profits come from somewhereyou, he writes.
Carney explains the many ways the government robs you: through subsidies, mandates, targeted tax breaks, prohibitions, eminent domain takings, bailouts, loans and loan forgiveness, as well as regulations. And each time it happens, we all sacrifice a little bit of our freedom he says.
if the government starts restricting our freedom to benefit somebody elsesomebody we dont think deserves itwe ought to be upset because the restrictions have a real cost. Government action makes us poorer and less free. On a strictly economic level, government action almost always reduces the net wealth of society.
So if you want to know how Enron happened, why your Coke is made from high fructose corn syrup instead of sugar, how the cartelization of the tobacco industry occurred, and the criticisms of ethanol, you should definitely pick up a copy of The Big Ripoff. Perhaps then you wont fall into the trap of believing the big myth anymore.
Julia A. Seymour is a staff writer for Accuracy in Academia.
There is increasing evidence that this switch is a major factor in the obesity epidemic in America. All so a few sugar farmers can be paid much above the world price for sugar and in the process come close to destroying the Everglades.
damn lobbyists
The only viable solution
The butthole bank I work for actively solicits PAC contributions to support PAC activities that do not help consumers. The suggested donation for my salary was $500. There are over 50,000 people at my salary level or higher.
related article. ping.
ping
Good find. If businesses are getting government goodies, they are not anti-big government.
... of other workers. Both unions and government restrict freedom. Friedman explains how the competition of employers for the talents of workers leads to ...
|
... the consumer. These agencies restrict freedom, stifle beneficial innovation, and become agents for the industries or groups they are intended to regulate. ...
|
|
... of other workers. Both unions and government restrict freedom. Friedman explains how the competition of employers for the talents of workers leads to ...
|
... by "approved" or "authorized." Friedman shows how "established" industries or methods, seek government protection or subsidization in their attempts to ...
|
It all leads to parasitic elitism doesn't it???
Only kidding, thanks for the link.
Wrong.
All so a few sugar farmers can be paid much above the world price for sugar and in the process come close to destroying the Everglades.
Right.
Lessons from the recent failure of Weirton Steel's ESOP
by John D. Russell May 2004
Weirton Steel's 20-year experiment in worker-ownership ended in bankruptcy May 2003 leaving thousands of workers with worthless stock. Pension promises have since been broken and health benefits terminated
I laughed out loud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.