Posted on 08/07/2006 7:48:55 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Reuters withdrew all 920 photographs by a freelance Lebanese photographer from its database on Monday after an urgent review of his work showed he had altered two images from the conflict between Israel and the armed group Hizbollah.
Global Picture Editor Tom Szlukovenyi called the measure precautionary but said the fact that two of the images by photographer Adnan Hajj had been manipulated undermined trust in his entire body of work.
"There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image," Szlukovenyi said in a statement.
"Reuters has zero tolerance for any doctoring of pictures and constantly reminds its photographers, both staff and freelance, of this strict and unalterable policy."
The news and information agency announced the decision in an advisory note to its photo service subscribers. The note also said Reuters had tightened editing procedures for photographs from the conflict and apologised for the case.
Removing the images from the Reuters database excludes them from future sale.
Reuters ended its relationship with Hajj on Sunday after it found that a photograph he had taken of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on suburban Beirut had been manipulated using Photoshop software to show more and darker smoke rising from buildings.
An immediate enquiry began into Hajj's other work.
It established on Monday that a photograph of an Israeli F-16 fighter over Nabatiyeh, southern Lebanon and dated Aug 2, had also been doctored to increase the number of flares dropped by the plane from one to three.
"Manipulating photographs in this way is entirely unacceptable and contrary to all the principles consistently held by Reuters throughout its long and distinguished history. It undermines not only our reputation but also the good name of all our photographers," Szlukovenyi said.
"This doesn't mean that every one of his 920 photographs in our database was altered. We know that not to be the case from the majority of images we have looked at so far but we need to act swiftly and in a precautionary manner."
The two altered photographs were among 43 that Hajj filed directly to the Reuters Global Pictures Desk since the start of the conflict on July 12 rather than through an editor in Beirut, as was the case with the great majority of his images.
Filing drills have been tightened in Lebanon and only senior staff will now edit pictures from the Middle East on the Global Pictures Desk, with the final check undertaken by the Editor-in-Charge, Reuters said.
Hajj worked for Reuters as a non-staff contributing photographer from 1993 until 2003 and again since April 2005. Most of his work was in sports photography, much of it outside Lebanon.
Hajj was not in Beirut on Monday and was not responding to calls. He told Reuters on Sunday that the image of the Israeli air strike on Beirut had dust marks which he had wanted to remove.
Questions about the accuracy of the photograph arose after it appeared on news Web sites on Saturday.
Several blogs, including a number which accuse the media of distorted coverage of the Middle East conflict, said the photograph had been doctored.
Have those links gone dead?
In a word, redhanded.
I said one more. But I was wrong, they didn't find it.
Weren't there other photogs who showed pics of Green Helmet Guy?
Aren't all of THEIR photos now suspect as well?
It don't mean nothin' if they haven't booked Green Helmet Guy for the opening act.
I wonder. We shall see.
Inaccurate? This unsupportable dreck goes beyond inaccurate.
They know darn well that he has doctored all [920] of them in some fashion.
But this? This is insane.
Israeli's need to take out the reporters/photographers in order to win this war.
And by splattering your sickness on threads all over the forum, you create the impression that Freepers are generally this nuts. It's the pride you seem to take in it that passes me by, though.
had altered at least two images
there now, I fixed it for them.
Oh yes.... so he just covers up the "dust marks" with extra smoke (and mirrors?!!).
Why not just print the truth? It's free!
Twisting and distorting the facts to the point of fiction and taking people's comments completely out of context to suit their agenda are still OK, too.
There is no power in reporting the truth.
Israel should kill the reporters and photogs covering the war?
You don't have to be a know-it-all to see how crazy that is.
Ping! In case you haven't seen this yet. They pulled all his photos...
"when they remove"
Too late, the damage has been done--of course that is what rooters intended all along. If they were serious, the senior staffers would be gone too.
Wouldn't be the first time a trained camera pool all deliberately misrepresented an event.
Ocassionally you will see one photograph of all the photographers exploiting a "tragedy".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.