To: Sam Hill
Reuters dumps the fake photographer:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=109338
Great that they are being forced to take the matter at least a tiny bit seriously -- but will they fully investigate ALL of the guy's work, especially Qana and other possible "fake but accurate" scenes????
549 posted on
08/06/2006 2:32:42 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Democrats do want to see victory in the War on Terror.......just not for our side........)
To: Enchante
"...Adnan Hajj, said the image was changed after he tried "to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under."
re: story linked in #549....... must be about the lamest non-excuse ever heard, I'm amazed Roto-Rooters would even repeat such nonsense....... (1) "dust marks" on digital photography, I think not, obviously he was simply trying to "improve" his photo; (2) any computer screen is going to allow him to see what's on the screen well enough, no matter what the external "bad lighting conditions" might be........ he's full of it.
550 posted on
08/06/2006 2:36:55 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Democrats do want to see victory in the War on Terror.......just not for our side........)
To: Enchante
Maybe they should think twice about hiring locals who often have a vested interest.
(But who am I kidding?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson