[stuck_in_new_orleans]

That's a ridiculous argument. Based on your logic then no fake UFO pictures could be disproven which has happened more often than not

UFO= not real....burning building=real....that much smoke coming from this burning building=unknown. Got any other asinine generalizations?

[PajamaTruthMafia]

Look at these. They may help you.

[GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos]

Just pointing out the total idiocy of your point. Many UFO pictures have been disproven without the original. You suggested the original was needed to disprove the authenticity of a photo. Can you admit you were wrong yet? Or are you as illogical as you are blind? You can't see the identical smoke patterns? Time to get glasses!