To: Dark Skies
If the Hezbollah fortifications were so in-depth near the border... why not an amphibious landing further up the Lebanese coast? Choke-points can always be vaulted.
5 posted on
08/01/2006 6:26:50 AM PDT by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: johnny7
I believe the air campaign is accomplishing much the same thing, without putting IDF troops at risk.
Plus, we are not talking about the USMC here; I am not certain that Israel has the sealift capacity for a divisional or even brigade sized amphibious operation.
Air mobile is another story, but even our army is moving away from massed airmobile assaults in this day of man - portable SAM's and RPG's. Think "Blackhawk Down" on a divisional scale -- massed airmobile assaults are a fine way to get a lot of your own troops KIA in a big hurry.
13 posted on
08/01/2006 6:43:56 AM PDT by
L,TOWM
(Liberals, The Other White Meat [This is some nasty...])
To: johnny7
I suspect that will occur in this new "to the Latani" phase.
33 posted on
08/01/2006 7:31:35 AM PDT by
expatpat
To: johnny7
If the Hezbollah fortifications were so in-depth near the border... why not an amphibious landing further up the Lebanese coast? Choke-points can always be vaulted.
---
What if the Hezbos are ready for that tactic too? They already damaged one of Israel's three Saar 5 missile boats early in the operation. If the Hezbos have missile crews dug in and concealed along the coast, amphibious landing could be real bloody.
39 posted on
08/01/2006 8:00:37 AM PDT by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson