Posted on 07/31/2006 5:09:06 AM PDT by SJackson
With all due respect, there was already an "armed military UN backed buffer force" in South Lebanon -- UNIFIL -- which was there to "guarantee security" for Israel.
However, UNIFIL saw Hezbollah arming itself and building fortified strong points...and did absolutely nothing about it. UNIFIL was still "in place" when this war began!
Any multi-national force cannot be a UN operation.
Yes, he is mixing up Al-Sadr with what happened in Fallujah, but they were distinct events -- though if IIRC it all went down about the same time, April 2004??, when the Sunni terrorists in Fallujah were going nuts and Mookie tried to take advantage of the situation by pushing in Najaf, etc. I think, IIRC, that Horowitz is wrong to conflate Fallujah with what Mookie was up to, but still correct in the overall point that it was political correctness that caused us to restrain our forces in both situations. One thing we still don't know (or at least I don't) is what the internal discussions were like between the interim Iraqi leaders and US officers and officials in-country, i.e., maybe a lot of the restrain came from Iraqi leaders who said they would break with the USA if we came down hard on Fallujah and Mookie, etc. That's not to say we shouldn't have done it, but we may not be talking only about our domestic left causing the restraint........
Israel is locked into a generational war of attrition,
Western civilization, not just Israel
No. UNIFIL was essentially an unarmed observer mission.
The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, UNIFIL, is one of the UNs oldest peacekeeping operations. Its nearly 2,000 troops and 50 unarmed military observers are tasked with seeking to maintain a ceasefire along the 70-mile (121 km) United Nations Blue Line between Israel and Lebanon, by patrolling, observing, reporting violations and liaising with the parties.
UNIFIL was established in 1978 by the United Nations Security Council (Resolution 425). The Council authorized a United Nations interim force for Southern Lebanon for the purpose of confirming the withdrawal of Israeli forces, restoring international peace and security and assisting the Government of Lebanon in ensuring the return of its effective authority in the area
.
See, a pasive force, no military enforcement at all.
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unifil/factsheet.pdf
I've been reading a book called 'The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam' and it seems that history with respect to Islam has been repeating itself for the past 13 centuries. Deals and cease-fires just don't work. When Ann Coulter joked about invading their countries, killing their leaders and converting them to Christianity, she was making a pretty good point.
My mistake; they weren't armed. But the rest of my response was correct.
Any other UN force, armed or not, will prove just as useless.
Maybe we can build a stairway to the moon also.
I say it wont.
You say the IFD has the means and capability to carry it out I say they don't.
But what ever we say will have no effect on the situation.
So thanks for the debate it was interesting.
God Willing will be back in six months time to maybe continue
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.