Maryscott O'Connor's pic from the WaPo article. Subsequent posts on her blog have her and her supporters griping about the photo but didn't she give her consent to be photographed?'
OR DID BUSH* PUT ROOFIES IN HER COFFEE?!?!?!
Posted on 07/11/2006 12:37:35 PM PDT by veronica
Oh, what a pity, disunity and mayhem amongst the liberals.
[Now returning to deep lurk mode during a busy summer season.]
Hillary's "people" are gonna pay a visit to Moulitsas "people"
She knows she cant even get the nomination without them, so she'll make sure they are irrelevant before '08.
G-d bless Kos. I couldn't disagree more with him politically, but I'm glad he's being authentic to his beliefs. We want these libs to say exactly what they want to achieve, which makes it all the more plain to make comparisons about what we want to achieve.
The danger lies with nervous political elites attempting to silence such people. They see how the Internet allows us all to evaluate our leaders, research what they've said and done, and share/discuss this in real time.
The Internet cat got out of the bag too fast for them to react. We must never let them try to put her back in.
Liberalism is egomania by another name; liberal bloggers arguing over trifles is like watching toddlers argue over who gets the red cereal bowl. It's amusing to watch but ultimately unimportant except to the other wingnut bloggers like Maryscott "Hotflash" O'Connor (her Wash Post profile is a hoot).
As you can see the disagreements are never about facts or policy, they are just more of the same finger-pointing and preening. Everyone's quest seems to be how many name-checks they can receive. Then it's back to arguing about angels dancing on the head of a pin (for those libs who believe angels exist, anyway).
It's a bit scary, but understandable, that 'serious' Dem leaders would pay these foam-at-the-mouth ranters any attention. What in the world can a workshy empty nester in Maryland tell them that would be relevant to leadership or electoral politics?
The smell of desperation permeates the Dem sphere. If the DNC leadership tries to satisfy the wingnut bloggers, they will be somewhere to the left of VI Lenin. If the DNC ignores the bloggers in search of a moderate (i.e., policies with half a chance of being accepted/implemented) then the bloggers will throw another tanty. What a crew. They deserve each other.
What? KOS not Cos?
Never mind.
Maryscott O'Connor's pic from the WaPo article. Subsequent posts on her blog have her and her supporters griping about the photo but didn't she give her consent to be photographed?'
OR DID BUSH* PUT ROOFIES IN HER COFFEE?!?!?!
Yeah, it's what I most fear. The internet has brought true democracy to American politics, but can politicians stand it?
Seems to me at some point they are gonna try and control this tool.
Its easy to understand their hypocrisy when you remember they have no moral basis to begin with.
Wonder how long it took Maryscott to come to this conclusion. This is the dominant characteristic of the left.
15 minutes of flame
buh bye!
Bring popcorn. It should be fun to watch.
LOL!
There's a parallel between this years Lieberman-Lamont race and Joe Duffey's 1970 campaign against Chris Dodd's father. Then as now, Connecticut is a test case for liberal insurgents, because it's a largely suburban state and most of their voters are affluent suburbanites.
PJ - Time for another Kos Kommix?
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.