Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
However, if they actually buy and provide the end viewer with both copies (clean and original) even for rental then it should not have been an issue.

No, its still breaking the copyright law. The still did the act of editing copyrighted material without permission. It matters not a whit if they bought 1000 legit copies, they broke the law.

586 posted on 07/09/2006 9:18:37 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser ("You can't really dust for vomit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]


To: Central Scrutiniser

I think the distinction is the renting.

If it was JUST selling it would not be a violation. If I hire an editor to edit my personal copy for my personal viewing AND i am not renting it out, I don't see a legal impediment.


588 posted on 07/09/2006 9:29:00 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson