To: fso301
"A 747 downed by a missle would bear lots and lots of tell tale shrapnel damage."None was reportedly found and the conspiracy theorists have been unable to publicly present any irrefutable evidence to to the contrary.
10 posted on
07/06/2006 5:23:59 PM PDT by
Hal1950
To: Hal1950
I remember some media photos of the "reassembled" wreckage and would like to review all of the photographic evidence released.
14 posted on
07/06/2006 5:35:17 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: Hal1950
You did read First Strike didn't you?
16 posted on
07/06/2006 5:40:45 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(The NYTimes, hang 'em high!)
To: Hal1950
Whatever might have been on the plane is one thing, but the whole "eyewitnesses saw a missle" doesn't hold water with me. Show the average person an X-ray and they wouldn't be able to spot the fracture.
23 posted on
07/06/2006 6:38:37 PM PDT by
AmishDude
(First Supreme Emperor of the NAU!)
To: Hal1950
None was reportedly found and the conspiracy theorists have been unable to publicly present any irrefutable evidence to to the contrary.That is also my understanding. I still think someone could have inserted a small incindiary device directly into the fuel tank. The device would have a trigger that dissolved at a set rate in the fuel and sometime later, viola! No explosive residue, no shrapnel because it was a fuel fire.
41 posted on
07/07/2006 5:56:13 AM PDT by
fso301
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson