Posted on 07/05/2006 3:50:31 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
El partido oficialista Acción Nacional está dispuesto a que se vuelvan a contar los votos de las casillas electorales donde hay dudas o errores, pero se opone a recontar los 42 millones de sufragios por contravenir la ley, declaró este miércoles su vocero, César Nava. "Nosotros estamos dispuestos a que se abran los paquetes en aquellos casos en los que se acredite la excepción prevista en la ley, que es básicamente que no coincide el resultado en el acta (de un partido), con el acta que tiene en su poder el consejo distrital", dijo el vocero a W Radio.
The official party National Action is in agreement with recounting votes from ballot boxes where there are doubts or errors, but is opposed to recounting 42 million votes in violation of law, said its spokesman César Nava this Wednesday. We are agreeable to opening the packets in those cases where it is allowed by law, that is basically where something does not concur with district law, the spokesman told W Radio.
"Fuera de ese supuesto, no estamos dispuestos a permitir que se vulnere la legalidad de la elección", añadió. "Esto no es un asunto de opinión, sino de legalidad", dijo. Si se cuentan de nuevo los votos de la elección del 2 de julio, no será necesario acudir al Tribunal Federal Electoral (TRIFE), propuso por su lado el presidente del Partido de la Revolución Democrática (PRD), Leonel Cota Montaño. "No podemos reconocer un proceso que presenta graves líneas fraudulentas, viciado de origen, por el grupo en el poder, que bajo ninguna condición pretende dejar la dirección del gobierno", advirtió Cota. Según el PRD, cuyo abanderado presidencial (junto a otros dos partidos) es Andrés Manuel López Obrador, en torno a un tercio de las casillas electorales (130.500 en total) presentaban "inconsistencias".
Outside of this situation, we are not agreeable with permitting invalidation of election legality, he added. This is not a matter of opinion, but one of legality, he said. If they count the votes of the July 2 election again, it will not be necessary to call a meeting of the Federal Electoral Tribunal (TRIFE), proposed by the president of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), Leonel Cota Montaño. We can not recognize a process that presents severe evidence of fraud, tainted by association with the group in power, that by no means is pretending to leave power, warned Cota. According to the PRD, whose presidential candidate is Andrés Manuel López Obrador, (along with two other parties) all three each presented ballot box (130,500 total boxes) inconsistencies.
El conteo oficial de las actas electorales comenzó este miércoles, y es el que debe dar un resultado definitivo del ganador de los comicios, según el IFE. En ese conteo los representantes políticos cotejan sus copias de actas con las que tienen los vocales de las mesas. En algunos casos los representantes de la izquierda "tuvieron la desfachatez de presentarse con actas alteradas, como en Tijuana (noroeste)", aseguró el vocero del PAN, sin dar más detalles.
The official count of the ballots began this Wednesday, and it (Instituto Federal Electoral IFE) is the one that should give the definitive result of who is the winner of the process, according to the IFE. In this count the political representatives are comparing their ballot records with those that the voting officials have. In some cases, the leftist representatives had the audacity to present altered ballots, as they did in Tijuana (northeast), assured the PAN spokesman, with giving more details.
ObraGore machine is still at, eh?
Remember when ex-Clinton officals went to other nations to help out candidates in their elections? It almost makes one wonder which ex-Clinton (or Gore) officials went down to Mexico to help out this time.
Doesn't look close enough to justify a recount.
No reason to post this other than I am getting hungry.
I expect a Mexican version of Katherine Harris to appear on the scene soon...
Do you have any direct knowledge (or even a reasonable theory) concerning the apparently quite high variance between the first count Sunday/Monday and the 'certified' count?
sounds like James Carvilles gang of disrupters are busy in Mexico.
I loved that advertising campaign.
"Doesn't look close enough to justify a recount."
The "first" count had the loser here winning by one point.
Is this correct, or has ol' SAJ fallen badly out of date?
...all the Spanish I need to know.
Sounds like those election stealers on the US Supreme Court. Bush and Katherine Harris must have had a hand in this one.
You know the rules......
-PJ
Yesterday it was votes from some of the more remote areas that put Calderon over the top, and those, also, did not come in until fairly late.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.