You have only to study the French Revolution that happened not long afterwards to see just what it was these people had to fear. The fact that our revolution turned out as it did is a credit to the extraordinary men who saw us through that period. They were people who showed rare selflessness and discipline. We are truly blessed that we had them to lead us. Other people have not been so lucky.
I can forgive someone for being skeptical of a "great leader" claiming to be "above all that," given the ample evidence we can all point to. All men are subject to temptation and very few have what it takes to carry through and do the right thing. Washington's character, perhaps above all, set the moral tone for our government and the men who run it. His rejection of a crown and insistence on serving only two terms as president have left an amazing example that has served us well. FDRs rejection of that honorable tradition did much to tarnish the nobility of government service, particularly within his party. It's all about them, not about us. It explains a lot. They are much closer to Robespiere than Washington.
I would strongly recommend this book to anyone who has an open mind and an interest in our history.
You're absolutely correct.
I remember reading somewhere about an interview with an old Russian bubba (grandmother) who was asked:
What's the best form of government?
Her reply: "good czar".
Then she was asked: What's the worst form of government?
Her reply: "bad czar".