Skip to comments.
Honor the Threat (Treason Sinkhole swallows up Old Hag)
TownHall.com ^
| Saturday, July 1, 2006
| Lorie Byrd
Posted on 07/01/2006 12:07:10 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..
Have a great weekend, y'all.
To: JohnHuang2
Another terrific post! :-)
Hope you have a joyous FORTH!
3
posted on
07/01/2006 12:11:25 AM PDT
by
nopardons
To: JohnHuang2
4
posted on
07/01/2006 12:13:31 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
To: JohnHuang2
Hey, Long time no read =o)
I missed this great writing.
5
posted on
07/01/2006 12:14:46 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Bush lost his mojo??)
To: JohnHuang2
6
posted on
07/01/2006 12:21:30 AM PDT
by
corbe
(mystified)
To: JohnHuang2
As the little boy said, after bringing home a straight "F" report card for the third time...
"Long time, no 'C'..."
( ~groan!~ )
( hattip: Boy's Life, circa 1959 )
Good ta' "C U," John.
7
posted on
07/01/2006 12:26:38 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
To: JohnHuang2
8
posted on
07/01/2006 12:29:51 AM PDT
by
Exton1
To: JohnHuang2
Heads up
We're going in!
9
posted on
07/01/2006 12:32:24 AM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: JohnHuang2
Great Post John, I wish I could effect their bottom line, really hurt them in the pocketbook. Amen.
10
posted on
07/01/2006 1:21:44 AM PDT
by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: JohnHuang2
11
posted on
07/01/2006 2:18:27 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: JohnHuang2

It's hard out here on a hag.
12
posted on
07/01/2006 2:30:42 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: JohnHuang2
The NEW YORK TIMES...You would think the paper from the city where 3,000 beings died in an unprovoked attack on America would put the left wing radical nonsense in the deep freeze.
Guess again folks...who's the enemy here?
To: AngelesCrestHighway
"You would think the paper from the city where 3,000 beings died in an unprovoked attack on America would put the left wing radical nonsense in the deep freeze."
Evidently not.
14
posted on
07/01/2006 3:01:41 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: Enterprise
looks like the treason sinkhole of the left to me!
To: JohnHuang2
I loved your 2 cents.
We need to honor the threat presented by the NY Times.
16
posted on
07/01/2006 3:58:57 AM PDT
by
freema
(Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
To: JohnHuang2
The NYT editors originally said said they had to go public because it's the public's right to know about such a secret program. They have since changed that excuse to the fact that there is no harm in their reporting on this program because everyone knew about it anyway. So which one is it?
Civil rights groups certainly didn't know about it. But they do now and are threatening to sue the financial institutions involved in the EU.
Co-Chairman of the 9/11 Commission Kean said that very few people even in the banking world know about SWIFT and how it works, and almost no one would have had any idea that the US was able to get access to this data.
Kean further said that: "The terrorists didn't know the financial transactions went through this one group. Treasury told me, this was a method of financial tracking that people didn't understand, that nobody knew this was how things were done. Top-notch people in the US didn't even know."
17
posted on
07/01/2006 4:10:46 AM PDT
by
Peach
(Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
To: JohnHuang2
- Given how fast its circulation is falling, outing top secret programs could be part of the paper's drive to sign up new al-Qaeda subscribers to offset the loss....
I propose that we redeploy the New York Times to a maximum-security U.S. penitentiary. No, this ain't a "pull out," just a redeployment. Change to succeed. Change their location to the slammer until they give up their "source" or "sources." You have a better chance at success. And yes, let's have a strict timetable -- let's have the leaker or leakers face a redeployed firing squad by no later than two years ago. --JohnHuang2
Excellent, John.
Several points:
- Disseminators (especially forewarned disseminators) of the leakers' leaks are leakers, too.
- Thus, plug 'em all. That's the only sure way to plug the leaks. In fact, plugging the disseminator is arguably the more effective remedy.
- Now that the Times has--AGAIN--blown the cover on another of America's effective terrorist-nabbing/ terror-thwarting tools, it's only fair for Pinch, Keller et al. to hand over its newly compiled list of terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. That is to say, it's only fair that the Times give its new subscriber list to Bush.
- "What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."
-
James Madison
When the founders granted 'The Press' special dispensation, they never considered the possibility that traitors in our midst would game the system. But that is precisely what is happening today. (Hate America? Support jihad? Become a 'journalist!')
This was bound to happen. The premise behind the First Amendment as it applies to the press--that a vigilant watchdog is necessary, sufficient--indeed, possible--to protect against man's basest instincts--is tautologically flawed: The fox guarding the White House, if you will....
-
READ MORE
IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT (Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?) by Mia T, 6.27.06
PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES by Mia T, 06.26.06
WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES by Mia T, December 29, 2005
-
-
-
|
18
posted on
07/01/2006 4:42:00 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Peach
Time and again, when leaks of programs initiated shortly after 911 appear, the person quoted in this article is strangely absent from the discussion... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3387941.stm People forget that in the middle to late 90s when O'Neill was CEO of Alcoa, Bill Clinton interceded on his behalf of Alcoa to get materials being hoarded by Marc Rich when no other aluminum company could get materials. Alcoa was on the rocks and BC bailed them and O'Neill out. PO owed BC big time.
It is strange that now a Google search on related key words returns absolutely nothing on this issue. What I did find was that O'Neill and Clinton are spending a heck of a lot of time together on various initiatives.
19
posted on
07/01/2006 5:10:26 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(There are only a few absolute truths in life, the rest are just opinion.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
20
posted on
07/01/2006 5:11:01 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(There are only a few absolute truths in life, the rest are just opinion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson