Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 9/11 Deniers
Salon ^ | June 28, 2006 | Farhad Manjoo

Posted on 06/28/2006 2:52:27 AM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Admin Moderator

remove that last post please I made a mistake


42 posted on 06/28/2006 7:46:12 AM PDT by swampmonster (Welcome to America. Please obey the law just like our polit....oh nver mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
"everyone's opinion has equal value"

I always say that everyone's informed opinion has equal value...but I set the bar fairly high on what constitutes informed.
43 posted on 06/28/2006 8:44:35 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The Democrats play to the same crowd when they support their 2000/2004 Republican Victory denials.


44 posted on 06/28/2006 9:56:35 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

22 year old filmmaker means he was 16 or 17 during the attacks and that his worldview was shaped by 8 years of Bill Clinton's PC American educational system.

He's only echoing everyone else's rabid moonbat theories.


45 posted on 06/28/2006 9:59:16 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

It WAS a conspiracy. 20+ muslims plotted to conduct coordinated attacks on US soil .


46 posted on 06/28/2006 10:00:14 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

47 posted on 06/28/2006 10:02:35 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: weegee

That picture enrages me every single time I see it.

The ARROGANCE...


48 posted on 06/28/2006 10:34:36 AM PDT by rlmorel (John Murtha: Out of touch, Out of His Mind. Lets make him Out of Congress! DIANA IREY FOR CONGRESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I want it on a t-shirt, especially as elections near.


49 posted on 06/28/2006 10:39:31 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: weegee

It is not just me, is it?

Hey, I like a good joke as much as the next person, and I can appreciate it when big-wigs clown around a little.

There is just something arrogant and sinister about them clowning around in this fashion.

"Yeah. We are doing the 'Do,Speak,Hear and Feel No Evil' thing, and laughing in your face as we do it. And there is nothing you can do about it! So...go pound sand."


50 posted on 06/28/2006 1:09:20 PM PDT by rlmorel (John Murtha: Out of touch, Out of His Mind. Lets make him Out of Congress! DIANA IREY FOR CONGRESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Under if auspices of PBS if I recall.


51 posted on 06/28/2006 1:34:16 PM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

It is MORE offensive (especially in light of the 9-11 attacks that were planned under Clinton's term) than any of the sports videos of teams or coachs horsing around with strippers or whatever.

Yet it didn't rate any outrage in the mass media.


52 posted on 06/28/2006 1:35:55 PM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I get the see no evil hear no evil speak no evil, but what is sandy burglar doing?
did he just stuff some top secret docs in his coat to bring to the NY times?


and 9-11 never happened?

somebodies tinfoil hat is on too tight and cutting off the circulation to the brain again...


53 posted on 06/28/2006 1:44:13 PM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: P-40

A couple lines down from the line you quoted I wrote "But they don't, not really--they have the right to an informed opinion." :)


54 posted on 06/28/2006 3:55:01 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
"...what is sandy burglar doing?"

Do No Evil, perhaps?

55 posted on 06/28/2006 8:13:22 PM PDT by rlmorel (John Murtha: Out of touch, Out of His Mind. Lets make him Out of Congress! DIANA IREY FOR CONGRESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Note: this topic was posted June 28, 2006.
Thanks RWR8189. Ron/Rand Paul ping:
According to Dylan Avery, a 22-year-old filmmaker in upstate New York, no terrorists hijacked United Airlines Flight 93 on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, and no passengers heroically revolted. The plane didn't even crash in that Shanksville, Penn., field, he says, but instead landed safely in Cleveland... Who, in Avery's telling, is the dark force behind all this destruction, the spinner of the big lie that Avery believes envelops the popular perception of 9/11? A most usual suspect: "The first person I'd bring into a court of law would be Dick Cheney," Avery says. "He's the person in the administration who I think is most responsible." Quizzing Dylan Avery on the events of 9/11 is like taking a peek into an alternate history, a parallel universe of half-truths and audacious propositions that rarely ever disturb the peace of the reality-based world... Avery says that the debris field in Shanksville showed nothing resembling a downed aircraft, that neither plane parts nor passenger remains were visible at the scene. The movie cites reports of an airplane landing at the Cleveland Hopkins Airport on the morning of 9/11, and in a tangle of logic deduces that, actually, two planes landed there and that one of them was Flight 93. Including hijackers and crew, the official story says that there were 44 people on board Flight 93 when it crashed, but Avery alleges that about 200 people were taken off the plane in Cleveland. He suggests that in addition to Flight 93's passengers, these 200 people included the passengers of the flights alleged to have crashed into the Pentagon and the trade towers. Avery says, cryptically: "It's interesting to note that the combined total of all the passengers from all four flights is 198. Or 243. Depending on who you ask."
I'm in a bathtub! It's on Mars! 243 minus 198 is 45! The digits add up to 27, which (2 + 7) adds up to 9! The digits of 45 add up to 9! 27 times 2 is 54, which is 45 backwards, and either way its digits add up to 9! DO I REALLY HAVE TO SPELL THIS OUT FOR YOU?!? DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE SPOON FED?!? [crashing noise as the straitjacketed patient rolls off onto the floor]
56 posted on 05/04/2014 2:58:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson