Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Continues Terrorist Support
Capitol Hill Coffee House ^ | 26 June 2006 | Sher Zieve

Posted on 06/25/2006 9:18:22 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Treachery in the MSM is surely nothing new. Doing something to stamp it out just might be...
1 posted on 06/25/2006 9:18:24 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"The New York Times: All the News that Aids and Abets the Enemy."
2 posted on 06/25/2006 9:20:17 PM PDT by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Here is where to voice your concerns about the NYT and leakers behind the 'veil'..

http://www.usdoj.gov/contact-us.html


3 posted on 06/25/2006 9:23:58 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Where
4 posted on 06/25/2006 9:25:41 PM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

5 posted on 06/25/2006 9:27:13 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Is this just another example of anything for a buck or is it that the NY Times well-known hatred of President Bush is now clouding and influencing everything the paper prints

I would say it is both.
6 posted on 06/25/2006 9:52:46 PM PDT by D1X1E
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

There are no words to describe my rage at the NYTimes and the LATimes and the person or persons who feel free to blab secret intel. info. I want the guilty ones tarred and feathered, then put in stocks in a very public place where we can have a go at them! Just WHO do these scum-sucking low-lifes think they ARE???? THEY'RE WORKING FOR THE EFFING ENEMY!


7 posted on 06/25/2006 9:55:06 PM PDT by Just Lori (To everything, there is a season.........Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

How long do we have to wait for something to be done. How much damage is too much? Americans hurting America. Hmmmmmmmm, don't we have a word for that?


8 posted on 06/25/2006 9:57:32 PM PDT by Frwy (Eternity without Jesus is a hell-of-a long time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

In WWII they would be asked 2 questions: Blindfold? Cigarette?

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


9 posted on 06/25/2006 9:59:46 PM PDT by bray (Hey Zaqueeri, say hello to Hitler, Stalin and Mohamhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

You really should direct your anger at the leaker!! The taxpapers are paying someone to sell us out.


10 posted on 06/25/2006 10:10:05 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The New York Times is expected to print just about everything they're given. That they don't print some things and print others based on ideological concerns is their concern.

The traitors and truly treacherous are those who have sworn an oath or signed a contract with the government and violated that and given over information to the NYT's for dissemination.

Freedom of the Press is important. It is important that the press be able to print any information that they confirm to be true, even if it is harmful to the country. Economics will take care of the wayward press eventually, as patriotic citizens boycott their products. Anti-American editors are eventually going to become anathema to stockholders who want their investments to show a profit.

But protections for leakers of national security information should not be protected under the first amendment. If a leaker feels that the information is important to get out to the public, and the leaker is right - the public will choose to protect the leaker from the consequences. But ideologically driven leaks, for crass political purposes, that endanger the national security are expressly unpopular - and the leakers must be brought to justice.


11 posted on 06/25/2006 10:25:22 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
and the person or persons who feel free to blab secret intel. info.

If you'll look at my post again, you'll see that the leaker is mentioned here.

12 posted on 06/25/2006 10:38:37 PM PDT by Just Lori (To everything, there is a season.........Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The story didn't damage Bush but it did damage the NYT.

Liberalism= Mental Illness
13 posted on 06/25/2006 10:40:59 PM PDT by John Lenin (The RAT party is still Stuck on Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

I wonder if some of today's journalist would have told the Nazis' or Nips about our ability to read their encoded radio traffic?


14 posted on 06/25/2006 10:47:14 PM PDT by chadwimc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

Sorry!!!!!


15 posted on 06/25/2006 11:06:25 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Time to mock them in song --- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655590/posts


16 posted on 06/25/2006 11:28:54 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frwy
"How long do we have to wait for something to be done."

"You will wait until I'm President again
because I have EVERYONEs FBI files, and WE have the power and the control and the Press.
"

17 posted on 06/25/2006 11:43:38 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Is this just another example of anything for a buck or is it that the NY Times well-known hatred of President Bush is now clouding and influencing everything the paper prints

If he or she has to ask that question now, he or she hasn't been paying a heck of a lot of attention to what the left has been up to for the last several years.

18 posted on 06/26/2006 1:50:11 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655590/posts


19 posted on 06/26/2006 2:06:30 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655590/posts


20 posted on 06/26/2006 2:06:39 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson