Just confusion on your part.
But hey, a snappy comeback beats arguments and evidence every time.
It's the evo primary response.
But all arguments, and any evidence that we might dare to draw inferences from, are all "metaphysical" according you you, because they involve "abstract thought". And what's more, they can always be interpreted in more than one way and so MEAN NOTHING. Why argue seriously any further once you've revealed yourself as an intellectual relativist and nihilist?