[Stultis]

I gave the definition of metaphysical several days ago. The only issue here is that you want to use a definition of 'concrete evidence' that includes metaphysical explanations of a fact and I don't.

No, that can't be the "issue" because by your dopey defintion ANY and ALL explanations of facts are "metaphysical".

[GourmetDan]

Nope, only if they are past, unobserved and not repeatable, like evolution.

Evos merely want to include metaphysical 'explanations' as though they are *facts* because it allows the deception to be continued.

Without deception, the facade crumbles.