[demkicker]

What Ann Coulter does is by no means "Scientific Research.

Funny, but I didn't realize you were the rule maker of what qualifies as scientific research and what doesn't. What Coulter lays out perfectly are published FACTS about the theory of evolution and in the process, destroys Darwin. But don't take my word for it. Read Godless to see for yourself, then argue your points.

[OmahaFields]

Did you read it? What "FACTS" did she lay out?

[wireman]

The facts as I seem them are that Ann Coulter desires to sell ever more books. Consequently, she is throwing red meat to the anti science rubes in this country and they are lapping it up.