[Diamond]

I've always wondered what kind of Designer would make His signature piece something whose sole propose is causing agonizing deaths in children and infants. Seems satanic to me.

Nothing at all wrong with wondering that, but the problem of evil is not a scientific question, and the existense of evil and imperfection doesn't provide positive evidence FOR evolution.

One thing I wondered aloud about, on this very thread in fact, is why some evolutionists, from Darwin on down, consider arguments that they constantly make for evolution based on what God would or wouldn't do concerning what is found in nature "scientific", and automatically consider arguments for God or creation based upon what is found in nature unscientific.

Cordially,

[js1138]

Exactly where is the article wrong?

[OmahaFields]

One thing I wondered aloud about, on this very thread in fact, is why some evolutionists, from Darwin on down, consider arguments that they constantly make for evolution based on what God would or wouldn't do concerning what is found in nature "scientific", and automatically consider arguments for God or creation based upon what is found in nature unscientific.

Because they are not scientific. They are musings, nothing more. Sort of like the tribesman that first sees the airplane go overhead. The local missionary taught him about God and angels but not about aerodynamics so he assumes that the plane is a product of ID held up by angels happy in the thought that he has solved one of the mysteries of the universe.