Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

Let me get this straight. I have to believe in evolution as fact before I can accept that the age of fossils can be determined by their fluorine content?

Do I have to believe in evolution as fact in order to accept anything science has accomplished, whether it involves the evolution-creationism debate or not?

How about carbon dating? Schrodinger's Equation? Quantum Leap reruns?


224 posted on 06/21/2006 11:37:22 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: BaBaStooey

You accept ratiometric dating? This is not a trivial question.

My questions are directed at creationists, and I haven't seen any on these threads that accept radiometric dating.

I am aware that folks like Behe, Denton and Dembski accept an old earth and common descent, but I haven't found any evolution critics on FR willing to stand with them on this.


228 posted on 06/21/2006 11:41:20 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson