Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Everybody be nice.
1 posted on 06/21/2006 8:33:48 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: PatrickHenry
Fundamentalist Christians insist on a literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis in the Bible, in which God made the world in seven days, culminating in the creation of the first two humans, Adam and Eve.

A variation of this is called "intelligent design" which acknowledges evolution but claims that genetic mutations are guided by God's hand rather than by Charles Darwin's process of natural selection.

If these morons can't (or won't) even report accurately what Genesis says, or what intelligent design is, why should anyone take anyone take any of their other metaphysical sanctimony seriously?

Cordially,

203 posted on 06/21/2006 11:16:27 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

The "with a little bit of luck and long periods of time" crew are at it again trying to force people to accept theory as fact and luck as a scientific pathway.

Still waiting on those human transistional fossils...


208 posted on 06/21/2006 11:23:42 AM PDT by SvdByFaith ("By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command... Hebrews 11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
"Knowledge of the natural world in which they live empowers people to meet human needs and protect the planet."

Actually, it empowers people to "fill the earth and subdue it." Sounds like this bunch of scientists is a shade green.

210 posted on 06/21/2006 11:24:21 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
. . . science does not seek to offer judgements of value or morality . . .

Then I trust such statements as "Knowledge of the natural world in which they live empowers people to meet human needs and protect the planet" have no business coming from the mouths who purport to be wholly engaged in scientific pursuits. Which is it?

213 posted on 06/21/2006 11:28:23 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop; PatrickHenry; marron; P-Marlowe; Frumanchu; The Grammarian; AndrewC; ...
Life on Earth appeared at least 2.5 billion years ago as a result of physical and chemical processes, and evolved into the species that live today.

I can't tell if this is from the "staff" or from the "declaration." It's about a third of the way down, no quotes.

It seems to come out of nowhere, linking ages before to evolution of that follow-on life.

It sounds like an assumption of abiogenesis....do you all agree?

325 posted on 06/21/2006 1:26:39 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Life on Earth appeared at least 2.5 billion years ago as a result of physical and chemical processes, and evolved into the species that live today.

Anybody write a letter to these clowns asking for evidence of this "scientific" just so story?

426 posted on 06/21/2006 7:11:19 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

My new twin granddaughters, born just nine hours ago.

There is more to life, Mssrs. Darwin and Dawkins, than your cramped and bigoted faith claims can begin to refute or deny. Though you be willfully deaf and blind, the greater and best part of life looks through your benighted souls and sings powerfully and wonderfully with the voice of an angel.

442 posted on 06/21/2006 8:26:30 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

People who teach their children silly creation myths in place of science should be charged with child abuse.


450 posted on 06/21/2006 9:34:35 PM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

"Knowledge of the natural world in which they live empowers people to meet human needs and protect the planet."

Non-sequitor.

Evolution has nothing to do with protecting the environment.

I am pretty much on the middle on this issue, but this was pretty weak.


468 posted on 06/21/2006 10:26:13 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
In a veiled attack on creationism,...

If they are so sure of themselves, why not openly attack?

They have to hide behind their burkhas???

481 posted on 06/22/2006 1:10:23 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

theories about the origins and evolution of life on Earth are being concealed, denied or confused with theories not testable by science," the declaration said.

Hey guys, let me know who wins after you hash all this stuff out.


579 posted on 06/22/2006 8:42:48 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
We urge decision-makers, teachers and parents to educate all children about the methods and discoveries of science and to foster an understanding of the science of nature.

Yes, like those bona fide demonstrations, shown in the lab, of one species changing into another. Oh, wait...never mind. ;-)

636 posted on 06/27/2006 7:44:58 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson