Great news. What's Murtha's fax #?
Pretty certain....
http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2006/06/haditha-report-to-fault-oversight.html
I'd like to write this on a baseball bat and beat Murtha over the head with it.
I'm inclined to believe that Murtha fell for a "sting" of sorts.
What does "no cover up" mean? That the Marines killed a bunch of civvies but did not lie about it, or that the whole story was crap [my guess], or something else?
First no Rove indictment, now this? Stay away from tall buildings for a few days so you don't get crushed by falling libnuts.
I'll say it again: The only coverup I want to hear about is when that vile smelly old traitorous excuse for a Marine is covered up with a layer of fresh sod.
Turda should resign if he had an ounce of dignity or was a real Marine.
Pray for W and the Hidatha Marines
This is good news, but don't get overjoyed just yet: it doesn't mean nothing happened. It means the Marines INVESTIGATED it like they were supposed to. The actual "incident" investigation is separate from the "coverup" investigation.
My guess ... the women and kids were actually the ones deploying the IEDs and taking pot shots.
Lt Ilario Pantano on Scarborough Country right now
Murtha claims that he was told by the 'military', which is often repeated by liberal hacks like Alan Colmbs (FOX News)? Why won't anyone ask Mr Murtha and Mr Colmbs who in the 'military' passed that information along to Murtha? If Mr Murtha was, in fact, told by someone from the 'military' that cold blooded murder was committed, then that someone must have a name? An establishment, such as the 'military' cannot tell Mr Murtha jack-$hit, however a person from the military could have. Who is that person????????????? I'm waiting Mr Murtha! And I'm waiting Mr Colmbs!