Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Have the Mainstream Media Ignored Our Heroes?(YES!)
Real Clear Politics ^ | June 19, 2006 | Cap Weinberger and Wynton Hall

Posted on 06/19/2006 8:49:50 AM PDT by kellynla

"Why do media refuse to report anything positive about the War on Terrorism?"

"Why haven't we heard more about the heroic actions of our military serving in Afghanistan and Iraq?"

"Why is the liberal media so intensely hostile to the efforts of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines?"

If you've thought or asked similar questions since the War on Terrorism began, you're not alone. Indeed, it sometimes seems some in the mainstream media have followed a single rule when reporting on our military and the War on Terror: all negative, all the time.

After years of watching and reading coverage of the War on Terror, many citizens, including us, have been awestruck by the lack of balance and objectivity exercised by American reporters and news executives. The dearth of hopeful or heroic stories reported has given viewers a lopsided perspective.

Case in point: the New York Times and their love affair with the Abu Ghraib prison abuses. To date, the New York Times has devoted over 50 front page articles to the story! Currently, not a single individual chronicled in our book, Home of the Brave: Honoring the Unsung Heroes in the War on Terror, - some of the most highly decorated members of the United States military - has received a front-page story devoted to his or her valorous actions. Even when Sergeant First Class Paul R. Smith was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the best the New York Times could muster was a story buried on page 13. A nation that ignores or worse attacks its heroes erodes and disparages its own ethos.

Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center, has catalogued hundreds of audacious quotes from leading reporters and media executives. Consider the following:

(Excerpt) Read more at 1.realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: war; wot
Does America remain vulnerable? Absolutely. Will the War on Terror demand continued sacrifice? Unquestionably. Yet as the brave men and women of the U.S. military march forward to defend freedom and fulfill their duty, so too must we fulfill ours: to pause and offer thanks to those who protect us for their heroism and bravery.

And above all, we must always remember the great and enduring lesson American history teaches: "Ours would not be the land of the free if it were not also the home of the brave."


1 posted on 06/19/2006 8:49:51 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The MSM has a mission. That mission is NOT to support or build the USofA.


2 posted on 06/19/2006 9:07:13 AM PDT by ASOC (Choose between the lesser of two evils and in the end, you still have, well, evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

People need to STOP buying newpapers!

Especially those of who make a habit of printing "tabloid-like" articles. Trash sells. And as long as people buy the trash, they will continue to print it. When you hurt them in the "purse strings" then they'll listen.

and, no I don't read newspapers. If I do, it is only an article that may be of particular importance to me.


3 posted on 06/19/2006 9:09:08 AM PDT by beachn4fun (The FR Canteen ~ FReeping 24/7/365 to honor our military, allies, and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
This is extremely vexing as we all know (CUZ THEY HAVE ALL TOLD US OVER AND OVER AND OVER) that they "Support the troops, even if they opposed the War." /sarc
4 posted on 06/19/2006 9:36:53 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

This is extremely vexing as we all know (CUZ THEY HAVE ALL TOLD US OVER AND OVER AND OVER) that they "Support the troops, even if they opposed the War." /sarc


5 posted on 06/19/2006 9:39:08 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

http://newsbusters.org/node/5956, an article that is very much in line with yours. Good read.


6 posted on 06/19/2006 9:43:54 AM PDT by casino66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Not only ignore, but often denigrate.


7 posted on 06/19/2006 9:55:40 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The url I listed didn't quite capture the particular article I was referring to. But, if you go there, scroll down to Sewell's article about Yellow Journalism.


8 posted on 06/19/2006 10:17:01 AM PDT by casino66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The only heroes that the lame media worships are named Kennedy or Clinton. I will take our "unsung" heroes any day of the week.


9 posted on 06/19/2006 11:00:38 AM PDT by CremeSaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"What drives American civilians to risk death in Iraq? In this economy it may be, for some, the only job they can find." - Dan Rather

Is the rumor true that Dan is signing up?

A steady job sure beats skid row. Maybe someone should tell Connie Chung about hazard pay.

10 posted on 06/19/2006 4:01:52 PM PDT by ChessExpert (MSM: America's one party press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"Currently, not a single individual chronicled in our book, Home of the Brave: Honoring the Unsung Heroes in the War on Terror, - some of the most highly decorated members of the United States military - has received a front-page story devoted to his or her valorous actions. Even when Sergeant First Class Paul R. Smith was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the best the New York Times could muster was a story buried on page 13. A nation that ignores or worse attacks its heroes erodes and disparages its own ethos."

O.K. I ordered the book! And I will display it proudly at the office.
11 posted on 06/19/2006 6:02:02 PM PDT by ChessExpert (MSM: America's one party press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

Hi Beachy!

People also need to stop patronizing the businesses that buy newspaper/TV/radio advertising. Losses in ad revenue are noticed much more quickly than declines in circulation or ratings.


12 posted on 06/20/2006 3:13:24 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (If the people lead, the leaders will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Good morning, AB

I agree with you. Hit them where it hurts....the pocketbook..

'Sides, I don't read newspapers cause I know they are slanted!


13 posted on 06/21/2006 4:10:06 AM PDT by beachn4fun (The FR Canteen ~ FReeping 24/7/365 to honor our military, allies, and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson