Very good points.
Although if Coulter had used less inflammatory language her actual points would not have been so utterly obscured in the explosive reaction.
If Coulter used less inflammatory language then she wouldn't be Coulter, and nobody would pay any attention to her.
But the explosive reaction PROVES her point about the harpies.
I think that Ann has drawn the fire of those who want to comment on this issue "over the top." Note that we're discussing how we talk about them, not the substance of what we say. Now that this is out in the open, we can now safely repackage the substance without going "over the top" and nobody can shoot. They've wasted their attackes on the way it was said, which makes the message itself fair game.
If Ann had not done it the way she had, bringing up the issue at all would have drawn fire.
Now let's see who has the cojones to take advantage of the situation.
Shalom.
The obscuring of her actual points is intentional.
We are seeing the effectiveness of the left's tactic, "Be as insulting as possible," which they have been using since 1966.
You just can't play nice with these people. Thank God we are starting to fight back.
What is the uninflamitory way to out media whores?
Her points are there in the background, getting their message across subliminally, every time the liberals rant and shriek. The title of the book gets mentioned. Of course they will never deal with the main issue head-on. That would be actually Dealing With An Issue.