Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing Reveals Its Cargo Loader
SpeedNews ^ | June 16, 2006

Posted on 06/17/2006 4:46:58 AM PDT by skeptoid

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: poindexter

Now that's comedy.


21 posted on 06/17/2006 8:57:41 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
I was directly below a Guppy (C97 mutation) when they dropped the flaps on approach - nearly stopped my heart seeing the wing area appear to decrease. In fact, I believe it did/does gain lots of lift from the expanded fuselage.

On another note, the modified 747 should also cut into the business' using Soviet era Antonovs to haul oversize cargo - I know Boeing sometimes hires them today.

22 posted on 06/17/2006 8:59:41 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

Wouldn't it be less trouble for everybody to build the whole thing in one place - Everett - and not to fly in anything much larger than the engines?


23 posted on 06/17/2006 9:10:02 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
.."oh,my God, the king has no cloths on!",
24 posted on 06/17/2006 9:16:34 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid
These reminded of the thread about a converted 747 made with tanks to fight fires. Then the thread about sweatiest city. What would you do with a jet with (65,000 ?)gallons of sweat?

Iraq?

25 posted on 06/17/2006 9:20:38 AM PDT by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

bump


26 posted on 06/17/2006 9:27:21 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
" What would you do with a jet with (65,000 ?)gallons of sweat?"

Dump it on a Mosque
27 posted on 06/17/2006 9:29:57 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GBA

There is a DC-6 Freighter that flies in here that does the same thing.

So, it's been done before...just have to engineer it a bit stronger and bigger for the 747.


28 posted on 06/17/2006 10:15:10 AM PDT by hattend (Stop! No more! The spirit is willing but the flesh is spongy and bruised! - Zapp Brannigan:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
That's the Evergreen International Aviation 747 Supertanker which just completed a month-long demonstration tour.

Check the FAQ page for some unique chacteristics of this AC. It apparently operates within the normal passenger 747 envelope and will always be 75 tons below normal gross weight.

And that's seven of the next largest tankers.

29 posted on 06/17/2006 3:58:46 PM PDT by skeptoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sharpee; sionnsar
You know, I wonder if some of this is exactly that "corporate I'm not going to let Airbus carry Boeing hulls" one-up-man-ship?
30 posted on 06/17/2006 4:33:05 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Not really.

That would take a lot of new infrastructure and a lot more new jobs/new hires in an area that has seen huge boom and bust. This allows the utilization of work forces in far away locations, but allows them to stay in their own homes with their families and lets their kids grow up in their own schools. It spreads prosperity.

Boeing is looking for previously unimaginable production rates. Their goal is 3 days for final assembly. Durrent 737 assembly is about 11 days. By spreading component manufacture around, they spread risk, allow for natural competition and refinement of the process, and can achieve much higher production and delivery rates.

Eli Whitney, Henry Ford, Henry J Kaiser, et al would be extremely proud of this development of their method.

Did I tell you they plan on assembling a 787 in three days?


31 posted on 06/17/2006 4:49:33 PM PDT by skeptoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I think it might be turn around time. They need to load and unload as quickly as possible. What is the flight time from Seattle to Italy and back? How many hours do they need for maintenance. The plane can only carry one of these assemblies at a time and with a 3day assembly time every hour counts.


32 posted on 06/17/2006 5:36:46 PM PDT by sharpee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson