Skip to comments.
Bush is the Next Reagan
Persian Journal ^
| Jun 4, 2006
| Slater Bakhtavar
Posted on 06/04/2006 2:24:14 PM PDT by nuconvert
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 701-716 next last
To: nuconvert
The next Reagan??
If GWB keeps up this push to turn America into Mexico North, he'll be remembered more like wimpy Ronnie-boy Jr. Reagan than Ronaldus Maximus Reagan.
As much as I loved and heralded George W. Bush these past five years, that's how much I reject his suicidal push to transform the America I know and love into a third world nation.
Until three months ago, I would have walked barefoot over broken glass from the Atlantic to the Pacific to support President George W. Bush.
I was the guy at parties who would get in the face of anybody who said anything negative or disrespectful about GWB.
Now, when I look at him I get depressed and sick at the thought of GWB's bogus new mantra....
"READ MY LIPS. NO NEW AMNESTY."
541
posted on
06/04/2006 9:27:40 PM PDT
by
Edit35
To: MojoWire
You are really a sad person. Illegal immigration is the least of our problems right now. We have a BIG terrorist bust in Canada showing us that the northern border is where our military should be and you are going to throw rocks at the only man in this entire sorry country that is actually standing by his principles.
542
posted on
06/04/2006 9:31:10 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: patriciaruth
Glad you suggested "George..." change his FR name - it's an insult
543
posted on
06/04/2006 9:36:40 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: maine-iac7
Glad you suggested "George..." change his FR name - it's an insult Gee ya think? lol
544
posted on
06/04/2006 9:39:28 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: George W. Bush
So then by your lack of an understandable answer you are saying that Newt accomplished nothing after '95. Newt hadn't yet sent any bills to conference by mid-'95. So I just think you've demonstrated you're too stupid to argue with.
During Newt's first 100 days Newt accomplished a lot. ~9 out of his 10 contract items passed the house. So I asked you what Newt accomplished after '95.
To which you respond that Newt hadn't sent any bills to conference by mid '95.
The question of what Newt accomplished after '95 remains unanswered by you.
You're response shows that you are a dope.
To: maine-iac7
It really surprised me. No one had ever said that before.
To: FreeReign
Passing the bills in one house with a majority is nothing. It's getting them through conference that's the challenge. And Newt and his freshmen class accomplished more in succeeding years, hammering home that initial victory once the Clinton and the Dims caught their wind and really tore into them.
I thought it was a remarkable record. Until Xlinton left office, every year the government's deficit was shrinking. Too bad that record of fiscal restraint ended in FY 2002.
To: George W. Bush
No, they have no WMD. The Soviets had plenty.They also had territory...if they used their weapons they risked annihilation. We are facing a whole different threat now, waged in the name of a religion with over 1 billion adherents connected by technology, funded by who knows who, taking up residence in the West waiting for the word or plotting, using liberal democracies to advance and protect their theocratic views, particularly in Europe. We can't even get our arms around who the enemy is let alone determine their ultimate danger, particularly with the likes of Iran in the mix.
548
posted on
06/04/2006 9:53:47 PM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: FreeReign
To which you respond that Newt hadn't sent any bills to conference by mid '95. I think he may be forgetting or ignoring the 1996 Welfare Reform Act.
549
posted on
06/04/2006 9:56:01 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
To: Jewels1091
explain to me why if these people don't like Bush anymore because he doesn't goose step to their ideals, why are they at this site??? Why don't they go where everyone hates Bush, I'm sure they would be more comfortable. Amen
551
posted on
06/04/2006 9:59:36 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: Dawnsblood
but I admit Gov grew under Reagan I admired and trusted Reagan - I lived under Gov Reagan and worked on his first bid for Pres.
Then I worked on both successful campaigns back here on the east coast - had a group that got private tour of the WH and had Him as our main speaker at our conference....
I was deeply disappointed when he didn't fulfill his promise to dismantle the federal Bureau of Education...had he done so, we would not have the gays taking over our schools and kids minds starting at kindergarten...and states and local school boards and parents would have the say.
But he was not a God, nor was he a KING.
Bush is not a KING, nor a dictoator---altho many here seem to think he should able to just give an order and it would have to be followed - no congress or senate to worry about.
He has, however, kept many of his promises- and maybe some of us should take a little refresher course and calm down a bit/
read this thread for a reminder...(no one will ever be as perfect as some posters here, but by damn, we are lucky he's the man at the helm in these times.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1636664/posts
552
posted on
06/04/2006 10:25:47 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: ohioWfan
yep, everyone needs to stop and take a refresher course:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1636664/posts
553
posted on
06/04/2006 10:33:32 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: Mo1
This article puts into words what I've been thinking for months now.
554
posted on
06/04/2006 10:41:48 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: ohioWfan; EternalVigilance
When all is said and done, President Bush will have done as much or more for conservativism as Reagan, and some day, if you haven't gone off the deep end of sanity because of your unchecked anger...........you'll admit that too.History will show that President Bush advanced conservatism in ways Reagan didn't have the time to, because of term limits. It hasn't stopped, dropped dead, or reversed. It's been advanced. Conservatism has won small battles in the time since Reagan left office, but the larger war against liberalism and all that it enshrines, still exists.
555
posted on
06/04/2006 10:47:36 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BW2221
No one is denying that Reagan made a major mistake on amnesty. But great leaders learn from their own mistakes and the mistakes of others ... AND DON'T REPEAT THEM.Bush isn't making a mistake over immigraton. The biggest mistake would be is to do NOTHING.
556
posted on
06/04/2006 10:53:31 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: Jewels1091; EternalVigilance
like i said, you seem to think you are the only person who knows how to run this country, you run for president..you should be voted in with a land slide since you think everyone should agree with you.I seriously doubt it would be a landslide, or Alan Keyes would have been Senator from Illinois.
557
posted on
06/04/2006 10:55:09 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: nuconvert
558
posted on
06/04/2006 10:57:51 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: Dawnsblood
Gotta disagree... cuting Gov is the right thing to do... Bush has failed thereIt wasn't one of his promises. Reagan promised to cut the size of government, but it's been growing since FDR.
559
posted on
06/04/2006 10:58:25 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: FreeReign
Absolutely. Newt was a liability once the Clinton's played gutter politics, which made him focus on shoring his personal reputation instead of doing the job he was voted to do.
560
posted on
06/04/2006 11:02:38 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 701-716 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson