To: A CA Guy
From what I understand, his records were released to a couple of Kool Aid drunk Boston reporters -- for the Herald, I believe. My guess is that was done because it would take a mountain of legal action to get the reporters to give up their "privileged information."
That's my understanding, anyway. Someone may offer more insight.
18 posted on
06/02/2006 10:56:34 PM PDT by
JennysCool
(Auxiliary Member of the Anaheim Azusa and Cucamonga Sewing Circle Book Review and Timing Association)
To: JennysCool
So if he released it to koolaide drinkers alone, then he did NOT sign that form for public consumption.
That won't work.
I would want to know what he felt should remain hidden that he only let two favorable reporters take a peek.
20 posted on
06/02/2006 10:59:24 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: JennysCool
"... for the Herald..."
It was certainly not the Herald. Kerry does not have a lot of friends over there.
The Herald may be schizo a lot these recent months, but Kerry fans? Not so far.
108 posted on
06/03/2006 9:18:38 AM PDT by
Radix
(Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson