Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile; BurbankKarl; lentulusgracchus
Oh, this can't be right. Non Sequitur told me interstate compacts aren't allowed.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 3: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ...enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State..."

You might want to actually try reading the Constitution sometime. There are no pictures, but I'll be glad to help you with all the big words.

232 posted on 06/01/2006 3:34:18 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur; BurbankKarl; lentulusgracchus
blah blah blah Non-Sequitur claims to read "Constitution," and ignores article showing how that provision is routinely ignored just as Libertarianinexile said, Non-Sequitur posts snide comment about it nonetheless...

And if YOU read the article above, you might note that these states ARE entering into a compact, and Congress isn't involved. Oh, no, it's unConstitutional! So is the notion of excluding jury rights in suits at common law where the value in controversy is over twenty dollars, but then, you'd never know that from the U.S. Supreme Court, either. Thank goodness we have you around to kiss their 'interpreting-a-living-document-might-makes-right' fannies.

233 posted on 06/01/2006 3:49:23 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Bill, McQueeg and the President related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson