Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
"This move would actually benefit the GOP far more than the Democrats. It effectively puts California into play with a high probability of going red, whereas right now it's a sure-bet blue state."

That's exactly what I was thinking. All a republican candidate would have to do is win the popular vote, and they get all of California's electoral votes. If they were doing this in 2004, Bush wouldn't have even needed Ohio. He could have also lost a couple of other smaller states and still won.

145 posted on 05/31/2006 5:07:22 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: KoRn
Here in Colorado. After Gore lost. The Dem tried to push a bill throgh that would have split the electoral vote where the popular candidate would get 6 of the electoral and the loser 5 votes. It was SLAPPED DOWN BIG TIME.
The electroal college must stand as it is. As it is a check against heavy populated states. I would not vote in agreement to any change in the electoral college period.
161 posted on 05/31/2006 5:41:12 PM PDT by Don_Ret_USAF ( "TO CONGRESS, as one of your employers (the people of the USA ) I FIRE YOU.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson