Posted on 05/31/2006 6:27:32 AM PDT by kellynla
I suspect whatever killings occurred were perpetrated by terrorists wearing counterfeit US uniforms. This theory is supported by the fact, reported by the media in the run-up to the liberation of Iraq, that Saddam had accumulated a number of counterfeit US uniforms to be used by his people in a number of ways. Committing atrocities and then framing US troops for them in terrorist controlled areas would be a perfect way to use such uniforms. This would be particularly effective if the alleged witnesses were already terrorists themselves or terrorist sympathizers and the people who were killed were suspected supporters of the liberation and their families. Such tactics are certainly not beneath Saddam and the terrorists; indeed they are the very things they would love to do. They are also the very kind of things traitors like Murtha and the MSM would love to use to discredit the entire war effort. Before anyone even suspects those Marines of this group of killings, this hypothesis must be fully checked out and disproved.
"So what? People die during war"
"So what?"
There is a HUGE difference between collateral damage and MURDER!
As much as the LSM would have you think, United States Marines are not Nazis .
And we do not go out and summarily murder people...not even the "bad guys!"
Semper Fi,
Kelly
Right on!! Please see my post at No. 21.
Jack Murtha, the EX-Marine, is a disgusting piece of trash.
It's very simple: we are the Good Guys in this war. And the Good Guys do not make war upon noncombatants -- unarmed civilians, refugees, prisoners, the injured, and the like. The Good Guys intentionally kill only the Bad Guys -- enemy combatants -- and no one else. If while fighting the Bad Guys a Good Guy kills a noncombatant by accident, no crime has been committed; such tragedies are an unavoidable part of war. But when the Good Guys intentionally kill noncombatants, or by inaction allow them to be killed, that's a crime: murder. And murderers are Bad Guys.
Therefore, as Good Guys, it is our duty to investigate charges of murder made against members of our armed forces, and, if they are found guilty, to hang them as an example to the others.
I hope this answers your difficult question.
Arwa Damon ... " I know the Marines that were operating in western al Anbar, from Husayba all the way to Haditha. I went on countless operations in 2005 up and down the Euphrates River Valley. I was pinned on rooftops with them in Ubeydi for hours taking incoming fire, and I've seen them not fire a shot back because they did not have positive identification on a target.
I saw their horror when they thought that they finally had identified their target, fired a tank round that went through a wall and into a house filled with civilians. They then rushed to help the wounded -- remarkably no one was killed.
I was with them in Husayba as they went house to house in an area where insurgents would booby-trap doors, or lie in wait behind closed doors with an AK-47, basically on suicide missions, just waiting for the Marines to come through and open fire. There were civilians in the city as well, and the Marines were always keenly aware of that fact. How they didn't fire at shadows, not knowing what was waiting in each house, I don't know. But they didn't."
My take is a bit different than yours.
I'd say she is saying the Marines, she was embedded with, were stand up guys, doing a great job, under the most adverse conditions.
Just my take, I guess.
Though I disagree with her at times, she has done a lot of good things at shining the light on real issues such as highlighting the MS-13 illegal gang presence.
On March 10, 1945, General Curtis Lemay ordered the firebombing of Tokyo. Over 100,000 civilians perished in a single night. Can you imagine the hoopla if this had happened today?
I tend to believe there's a good chance that the ones capped at close range... were done in by their own countrymen. These pukes watch CNN and know what works to their advantage.
Check out the dude's "In Forum" posts ... Sheesh!
ohhhhh, I read the piece and as I said before, right down th the last line Damon NEVER SAID anything remotely to "I don't believe the Marines murdered these people"
Now if you want to post a quote from the article,
post that...but you won't find it...anywhere!
Semper Fi,
Kelly
JAGs (mil lawyers) are so throughout the military COC anymore that at times one can do d*ck without them being integrally involved to some degree or another.
I think the freaks may be in for a surprise this time.
We KNOW their only concern is discrediting the war effort, so what they use as a talking point is really immaterial.
They can flog "Abu Grahb" like issues till the cows come home, but it will only move the nation as far as we allow it to move us.
In case I'm not being clear enough...I'm perfectly willing to ignore Haditha.
Her "conservative" image doesn't need any help, but who are you?
So is this the same Paul Hackett (Democrat Iraq veteran) who ran against Jean Schmidt in Ohio? He's also an attorney so it's possible. Be interesting to find out...
There is a big difference between now and then, back then everybody was personally affected by the war, they had many loved ones serving on the front lines. In this war, most people are not affected, or more bluntly, choose not to be affected by what is going on if they do not have any loved ones in harm's way.
But in those areas that are affected, support is phenomenal. I used to live in a small town in Montana. When the local Aviation Battallion returned from Iraq, over 3000 people greeted them at the airport.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.