Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clawrence3
There is NO law that we "fully enforce" - there are always limited resources for instance.

Of course not, but no one is going to tell me that reducing the flow of illegals from over 1 million per year to less than 100k per year is going to be prohibitively costly.

That doesn't means Senators are not interested in securing the border

If they're so interested in securing the border, why have they waited this long to act? It's not as if this problem is new, and it's not as if everyone's been ignoring it until recently.

Large numbers of congressmen have been attempting to call their attention to it for over a decade. Border state voters have been attempting to do something about it on their own since 1994, only to be foiled by the courts. For crying out loud, the Senate and our panderer in chief ignored it even in the face of 9-11. And only now are they finally doing something about it? Forgive me if I doubt their sincerity.

Furthermore, if they're so interested in securing the border, why are they holding border security hostage to their desire to amnesty illegals and double (perhaps triple) the rate of unskilled legal immigration?

59 posted on 05/31/2006 9:51:19 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity; Spiff
Just ask Spiff - we have expelled more than 6 million illegal immigrants since Bush took office - that's more than enough for me. I'd rather we let most of those in legally and then we can focus on catching terrorists and others we DON'T want to let in.
60 posted on 06/01/2006 5:41:58 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson