[tomzz]

I saw a thing on film recently in which a reporter asked Richard Dawkins if he could name a single case of a mutation which resulted in an increase in information, and the guy was totally stumped; he just sat there with a dumb look on his face for a whole minute or thereabouts.

[VOA]

I saw a thing on film recently in which a reporter asked Richard Dawkins...

Friendly request:
Any chance you remember the name of the film...or producers/source?
If you could kindly at least get me that, I'd Google it down.

Dawkins is surely a smart fellow, but for Oxfordians commenting on
the ultimate causes of things I prefer Alistir McGrath.