Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh and Liberalism’s Fatal Flaw
The American Thinker ^ | May 15, 2006 | Vasko Kohlmayer

Posted on 05/15/2006 5:36:17 AM PDT by Quilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 last
To: Freedom4US
Truth is, there WAS no conservative thought expressed for public consumption, unless you count William F. Buckley, and the WSJ.

Buckley's Firing Line was on NPR. If my memory serves me.

He was way above the heads of most Americans. And not entertaining unless you could appreciate his dry wit.

But Rush is unique. I doubt a Sean Hannity could have pulled it off.

BTW. Rush claims Buckley as his mentor during his intellectually formative years.

101 posted on 05/15/2006 9:48:50 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Well, I ain't William Saffire, and I have a feeling he probably won't see this--LOL!


102 posted on 05/15/2006 9:48:57 AM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
"The Rush Limbaugh and Liberalism’s Fatal Flaw analysis was excellent, however, it missed another aspect of Conservative Talk Radio that may be far more important that the left's inability to field effective commentators. That aspect is satire, which in my estimation is the deadliest form of political commentary in the pundit's arsenal."

Yes it's easy to make fun of liberals and their pretentions, as Rush skillfully does, because they're so irrational. The point of the article.

103 posted on 05/15/2006 10:03:51 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
It is natural to claim objectivity if you can get away with it. Conservatives would do so if they dominated journalism.
I disagree. Conservatives like Rush don't claim objectivity. What they do claim and insist upon, I might add, is rationality.

That's the essence of the article. A conservative argument is more rational than a liberal argument. Hence Rush's success in a format that demonstrates rationality and exposes irrationality.

I absolutely agree that a conservative argument is more rational, more modest and less arrogant and emotional than an anticonservative argument. But the point I was making is that it is natural for anyone who has never been subjected to contrary arguments to assume that their own beliefs are objective. Liberals have been in the position of being able to discount conservative ideas because their circular arguments are buttressed by a mutual admiration society of journalists assuring liberals that anticonservative news is "objective" and whatever happens to reinforce conservative beliefs "isn't news."

Conservatives who heard that propaganda have had to sharpen their arguments and drop any which they cannot back up with logic. Conservatives would like to think and declare that they are objective, it's a natural subject human perspective. But they have known for half a century or more that the possibility of arguing from that premise is not available to them.


104 posted on 05/15/2006 10:05:29 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; Vision
"The message actually is, "Mother is here, dear, just don't you worry your sweet little head over a thing." We are supposed to leave the thinking to them."

Maybe its me but I don't see this as a message; just an attitude. Anyone who doesn't see the USA as being the fault in the World is a fool. The only way to rectify the problems of the World is through liberal ascension. No plan, no ideas, just 'trust us'.

Sorry, but that is not a message to me, only a hype. That's been my point. The DimocRats have not been 'on message' for years because they really have no message to give.

105 posted on 05/15/2006 10:09:07 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; Blueflag; robertpaulsen
Conservatism requires methodical exposition, quite unlike liberalism which can only survive in the realm of disjointed statements and unsupported assertions.

Yes, like the bumper stickers you folks posted. They "think" in bumper stickers and speak in bumper stickers.

But bumper stickers serve another purpose also. I'm not an expert on cults, but I've read a bit about them and it seems cults all have little mantras they are taught to repeat when challenged.

This is "lalalalala I can't hear you lalalala..." to block out thoughts and questions dangerous to the "teachings", and at the same time it reinforces the "teachings". IOW a form of mind control by dulling and robotizing the mind and focusing it only on the "teachings".

I don't think it's a coincidence that the death cult requires 5 interruptions in every day wherever its followers may be in order to repeat their mantras and keep the cultists in line. Maybe that's why the liberals seem to feel so much empathy for what should be an enemy.

106 posted on 05/15/2006 10:14:03 AM PDT by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: joeystoy
"Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see through them rather easily."

Oh, so true!

107 posted on 05/15/2006 10:32:12 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

I think their main problem is that the more they brodcast their agenda the more it sounds like Coast to Coast with Art Bell.


108 posted on 05/15/2006 11:33:58 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...

109 posted on 05/15/2006 6:56:45 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson