[aNYCguy]

Your assertions do not make fact, observation is subjective, your data points are theoretical, therefore any claims you have made inversely are false.

You might want to learn what the inverse of a proposition is before you embarrass yourself again attempting to look smart.

[taxesareforever]

I have provided two references for multiple observed instances. That is sufficient

WOW! Two references to back up the lie of evolution. If your references stated what was speciated it went beyond me. Saying that there is enough data elsewhere is a copout by the scientists in your "referenced article.I herefore consider your speciation argument garbage.