Replies

Okay, Dimensio, let's see you put your money where your mouth is. However, your name may already be on this list. Take the challenge. I dare you. You shouldn't have a problem winning the prize since you seem to have all the answers. Check out Rule #5 though. It may put a hurdle in front of you. http://www.csulb.edu/~jmastrop/prize.html

You will probably ask for the whole site. Here it is. Enjoy. http://www.csulb.edu/~jmastrop/

That first sentence, Get real taxes, when have you ever seen anything that would give you that idea?

And then just look, several pages of blasting at you and not hardly a genuine fact that jumps out among it (not to mention 'science'), other than the fact that these people have a zealous obsession (that exceeds religious) to demolish anyone that does not buy into their ideology of illusion.

Wolf

For years, the claim has been made that evolution is an inverted-fantasy religion taught in the public schools in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The Debate Dodgers (see below) unanimously have failed to defend in court against that claim. Therefore, the default-judgment applies to all evolutionists in general and particularly those on the Debate Dodgers List. This is proof positive that evolution is an inverted-fantasy religion taught in the public schools in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

The above is the opening statemen of the "challenge" to which you refer. The challenge claims that a default judgement is owed by "all evolutionists". This is a false claim, unless it can be shown that "all evolutionists" were served with court papers and a suit was filed in a court of law. Given that such a suit would be impossible to file, as no court would allow a plaintiff to claim all who accept the theory of evolution as defendants in a lawsuit, and that because there has been no actual legal challenge as claimed there thus cannot be a "failure" to defend that challenge in court, the "challenge" is predicating all claims upon a lie. If the organizers of this "challenge" are willing to predicate their basic claim upon a lie, then there is no reason to trust anything that they say.