Posted on 05/03/2006 6:37:26 AM PDT by P-40
Some things that President Bush just might want to mention one of these days...
Biodiesel Production Graph
http://www.biodiesel.org/pdf_files/fuelfactsheets/Production_Graph_Slide.pdf
http://www.biodiesel.org/buyingbiodiesel/producers_marketers/ProducersMap-Existing.pdf
Operating Plants: 65
http://www.biodiesel.org/buyingbiodiesel/producers_marketers/ProducersMap-Construction.pdf
Under Construction: 50
Under Expansion: 8
http://www.biodiesel.org/buyingbiodiesel/producers_marketers/ProducersMap-Pre-Construction.pdf
Pre-Construction: 36
Biodiesel is more plausible than every other alternative (vehicle energy) source mentioned, right now as is with existing infrastructure and engines.
I don't know why it isn't talked about a lot more.
I feel the same.
We have a moral imperative to do what we can to stop funding the many evil governments that sell oil.
It's crazy we aren't doing more with biodiesel.
Right now we are throwing away huge amounts of it, even just cooking oil.
The highways would smell of french fries though.
I'm convinced diesel engines are about to become much more popular. Until now, only inferior tech diesel engines were available in the USA, because the most efficient ones can't tolerate the high sulphur diesel we have. Europe has way better diesel engines, with more power and better fuel economy and reliability, thanks to their low sulphur fuel.
Now that the USA is switching to low sulphur diesel, we'll get the better engines...
My 1985 MB 300D Turbo takes biodiesel straight up. A bit hard to find at the moment, but a new retailer is about to open up this summer.
Then there is the cool factor with french fry exhaust. The Jenny Craig crowd chases after me.
And better than the bio-diesel process is the Thermal Depolymerization process. I don't know why this isn't being implemented more than it is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_depolymerization
http://www.thermaldepolymerization.org/
http://www.res-energy.com/index.asp
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2004-01-22-kantor_x.htm
Anselmo testifying before congress today.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060503/to265.html?.v=27
http://www.texogatech.com/safuel.cfm
Well, I'll be. Our state senator, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, just did a short piece on the news here about alternative energy and alternative fuels and their impact on Texas.
Yep. I too have an '85 300D and have run biodiesel in it. I'm using the regular stuff right now, because B99 is $3.29/gallon, and it does reduce the fuel economy a bit.
Also it can be a little more susceptible to algae outbreaks than petroleum-based diesel.
But the exhaust smell is indeed pleasant.
Diesel fuel in Europe is both lower in sulfur and higher in cetane than the crap we are forced to buy here. Our Diesel is the equivalent of low grade Mexican Pemex compared to EuroDiesel, great for trucks with lots of filters etc., but lousy for high performance autos/truck with emissions concerns.
The new ultralow sulfur Diesel (ULSD) will likely suffer some loss of the lubricating properties inherent in the fuel we use now, or better, used to use when sulfur wasn't a bad thing. This will result in increased fuel system wear.
The beauty of biodiesel is that it will has more lubrication properties than the petrodiesel, so it will have benefits far above the simple fact it does not have to come from some Islamofascist infested region of the world. It is also a superb solvent, and will clean out your Diesel fuel system like Draino, and some fuel lines will need to be updated to newer rubber compositions to counteract decomposition by the biodiesel. That is the reason older Diesels need to either be updated or avoid using it. Any older Diesel will probably have to do a few extra fuel filter changes when it is first used. Another downside is that it is prone to wax up at temperatures higher than that of winter mix Diesel, which will be a problem for the upper half of the country in the winter. No doubt a solution will be found, such as a higher petrodiesel proportion or some sort of additive.
BMW, Honda, Nissan, and others are planning to introduce Diesels when the ULSD is phased in during 2007. Daimler Chrysler is planning to put its CRD engine into more Jeeps and possibly some autos. VW is reintroducing its superb Toureg V10 Diesel, and Mercedes will likely expand its Diesel offerings.
Diesels are demonstrably superior to the complicated and expensive hybrid solutions that are being touted as America's savior. Diesels are ideal for towing and large loads, while hybrid powertrains are fairly fragile by comparison. Try a VW TDI sometime and see what it is like.
Once you go Diesel, you never go back!
A tiny chemical reactor that can convert vegetable oil directly into biodiesel could help farmers turn some of their crops into homegrown fuel to operate agricultural equipment instead of relying on costly imported oil.
"This is all about producing energy in such a way that it liberates people," said Goran Jovanovic, a chemical engineering professor at Oregon State University who developed the microreactor.
The device - about the size of a credit card - pumps vegetable oil and alcohol through tiny parallel channels, each smaller than a human hair, to convert the oil into biodiesel almost instantly....
Thanks for the informative and interesting post.
In particular I'm interested to hear about the many manufacturers with new diesel offerings in 2007 to accomodate the low sulphur fuel.
What is the mercedes CRD thing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.