Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise
Yes. If they have a right to be here illegally, they have an attendant right to use drugs illegally. Per NAFTA.

Forget about NAFTA. Fox is just playing catch up. If an American citizen, traceable and with property, does recreational drugs, he risks having a lot of property seized, simply because he's an easy target. If an illegal alien does illegal drugs, no one cares. Why should a Mexican have more rights in the U. S. than in Mexico? Fox is just leveling the field for his citizens.

Come to think about it, why should an illegal alien have more rights (or at least be less subject to the law) than an American citizen?

12 posted on 05/02/2006 6:36:52 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine

You have nailed it. It's about the money. The authorities can seize assets from a U.S. offender for minor offenses, but there is nothing to be gained from an illegal. I think that the seizure of assets for minor crimes needs to be severely restricted, and officers should have their priorities directed instead to more serious crimes. Too much money, manpower, and resources is devoted to petty nonsense.


13 posted on 05/02/2006 6:44:00 PM PDT by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson