Posted on 04/30/2006 7:15:23 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax
Did Kudlow agree with Pataki?
Yes, it is, and no it is not. It shows the American people, at least those that have an IQ over 65, how much damage that Washington has done to this country. And the magnitude of the burden, task, and load that the American people have been FORCED to support and tolerate.
Well, color me stunned.
But it is OK for the Transit Sysyem union to go out on strike?
Bizarre, I guess this is journalistic freedom and not a direct quote?
Pataki sure doesn't mind spending taxpayer dollars to feed, house, cloth and provide medical care for illegals. But, he's worried that businesses that hire these same illegals will be hurt by the boycott.
Sure am glad I left that lunatic asylum!
"First of all, clearly the most important thing is that we have to control our borders," he told WABC
Enough talk! I am soooo tired of hearing about it! Build the friggin' wall already!!!
I forgot...the taxpayers pay to educate their children also.
big time.
Should we start calling burglars undocumented guests?
What is Kudlow's stand on the issue?
Guess which way the political wind is blowing.
Here is a fascinating one for you.
Healthy NY the state subsidized health care plan will NOT require any documentation for people displaced by Katrina for applications. Just come here, write "Disaster Relief" on the app and you are in like Flynn. You could be illegal, or someone just moving here for the heck of it with no tie to Katrina at all. Simply write "disaster relief" and you are in.
Oh, and if you happen to actually be a state RESIDENT and TAXPAYER, too bad, full documentation required.
Thanks. No surprise that Kudlow is in the Barnes/Kristol camp on this issue.
"You don't take a demonstration to the streets for a political cause that's going to threaten our schools and close down businesses."
For crying out loud, this is exactly the route which the blacks took in the 1960s; it's a boycott, and it works.
There are millions of hispanics in this country who are NOT illegal, and they want their piece of the pie too. Up until now they've been invisible; but now they've arrived,
they are the new kid in the house, and the elder brothers and sisters have got to make some room.
Wait a sec, these are illegals he's talking about. Isn't he supposed arrest them instead of giving them suggestions about how they can continue to break the law? If they don't work tomorrow they are actually breaking the law less than they usually do on a Monday. Their employers won't be breaking the law tomorrow by employing the invader because the invader will be absent and Pataki thinks it's unfortunate that the employer won't have the illegal worker making the illegal employer richer tomorrow.
"Country Clubber"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.