Are we going to subsidize BP because they aren't doing well? Many would have us do the opposite when they are doing well.
1 posted on
04/26/2006 7:01:03 AM PDT by
freakboy
To: freakboy
No Windfall profits tax for them. Aw shucks.
2 posted on
04/26/2006 7:04:18 AM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: freakboy
"Are we going to subsidize BP because they aren't doing well? "
Well, it seems we already are subsidizing them.
3 posted on
04/26/2006 7:13:53 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: freakboy
>>BP, the world's second-largest oil company by market capitalization, posted a first-quarter net profit of $5.6 billion, down from $6.6 billion a year earlier.<<
Stop IT!
I'm getting all misty.
4 posted on
04/26/2006 7:14:35 AM PDT by
evad
To: freakboy
At $5.6 billion in net "PROFITS" they aren't doing well? LMAO
Wish I could "not do well" also.
7 posted on
04/26/2006 7:21:41 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
To: freakboy
15% drop comparerd to what? Their 50% in profits last year?
Another example of worthless media info.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson