Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HEMP FOR FUEL
ArtisticTreasure.com ^ | 04-23-2006 | Unknown

Posted on 04/23/2006 9:03:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I'm curious..

Almost every implementation of biodiesel I've read about advocates at maximum a twenty percent blend. Reducing our use of diesel fuel by 25% wouldn't deeply affect our dependence on foreign oil.

Six percent of the land area of the United States is a pretty significant amount. That's what, the size of Texas? I'm pretty sure that's more than the total amount of field coverage for alfalfa, corn and wheat combined.
21 posted on 04/23/2006 9:23:40 PM PDT by kingu (Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

I'm no dope smoker, nor do I support all the nonsense of the "libertarian" wing....but I think they are talking about the kind of Hemp with a THC content that would be more likely to give you a headache than a high.

Again, I'm no expert.....


22 posted on 04/23/2006 9:24:58 PM PDT by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The Greenies have started their campaigns and are out to convince everyone we can grow (looking for agriculture subsidies, hello) our way out of energy demands in spite of global demands.

Said another way, imagine the plethora of new ways to tax you and re-distribute that wealth in the form of bigger gubmint and higher spending.


23 posted on 04/23/2006 9:25:53 PM PDT by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect, it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I'm just picturing all the teenieboppers sniffing the tailpipes in the school parking lot.


24 posted on 04/23/2006 9:31:40 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KingKenrod
And as far as I know, smoking it doesn't turn you into a lazy moron,

Called my cousin, a long time rope burner, he said he get back with me in a couple of weeks. Next time I see him he'll say he hasn't talked to me in months.

25 posted on 04/23/2006 9:31:54 PM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hemp Executives

26 posted on 04/23/2006 9:35:08 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quantim

The "Greenies" actually "started" this campaign around 30-40 years ago...

many of them pass for sensible conservatives with a Pro-America impulse. They have been in an evil conspiracy working for American energy independence since around 1973.

This particular bunch of wild eyed agitators inhabit such well known subersive institutions as the Univ. of Kentucky Agriculture department.

Yes, some are looking for subsidies...Unlike the noble oil companies, corn farmers, pork producers, milk producers, wheat farmers, steel plants, citrus growers, sugar growers.........


27 posted on 04/23/2006 9:36:12 PM PDT by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Maybe instead of deisigning tasteless tomatos that ship well, we can use our scientific rescorces to design a variety of hemp that produces a much larger yield of fuel per plant. Hemp can be used to make paper as well, is this not correct?


28 posted on 04/23/2006 9:37:02 PM PDT by wolfman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Whatever we do we must end our dependence on foreign oil, our 60 year pact with the devil and the resulting realpolitk that has gone with it. Further, it constitutes an easily disrupted supply line an equally easy corruption of our principles and ideals. Either we just kick arab ass and take their gas or we become self sustaining and bow to no one. Thereafter, if we want to make a point with China, Iran, N Korea, et al., we can always park several tarmacs in the straights of Hormuz.


29 posted on 04/23/2006 9:39:44 PM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht
The "Greenies" actually "started" this campaign around 30-40 years ago...

It's actually their 'offspring' that we're dealing with now, lol.
30 posted on 04/23/2006 9:52:46 PM PDT by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect, it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: quantim
The Greenies have started their campaigns and are out to convince everyone we can grow (looking for agriculture subsidies, hello) our way out of energy demands in spite of global demands.

But if you actually start building one of the very projects they originally suggested, the Greens will file suit to stop you from doing it. Look what happened to the windmills and fish farms.

31 posted on 04/23/2006 9:53:24 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht

For some reason, I doubt this would ever work. I guess because it hasn't been reported by anyone else. This reminds me of those urban myths about ultra efficient motors, and perpetual motion devices.


32 posted on 04/23/2006 10:04:07 PM PDT by John Geyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht

Wait a second, isn't biodeisel being produced in the US by some plant in Alabama which is processing chicken scraps?


33 posted on 04/23/2006 10:07:10 PM PDT by John Geyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You can't get high off of industrial hemp

That explains the lack of demand for it.

34 posted on 04/23/2006 10:08:32 PM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu
6% of our land is 1/3 of our arable land.
35 posted on 04/23/2006 10:19:41 PM PDT by farfromhome (What does this button d.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Too bad the anti-Volstead folks didn't think of this back when it was illegal to consume C2H6O. "Hey, why not alcohol? You can even burn this stuff in your Model T!"


36 posted on 04/23/2006 10:53:43 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat (Yo quiero secure borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kingu
So true! The carbohydrate energy economy (wood and hay)started phasing out at the end of the 18th century. It was replaced by coal for transportation because of it's higher energy density. Coal ruled until the middle of the 20th century when it was replaced by petroleum that had even higher energy density.

Why would we go back to low energy density carbohydrate fuels that had their heyday (sorry) two centuries ago? It would require vast amounts of our arable land that is now open space or used to grow food. That's not a sound environmental policy.
37 posted on 04/23/2006 11:13:22 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: randog
Does anyone have a sane solution to our reliance on fossil fuels?

Hemp? Give me a break...there's not enough land to grow what we would need.

38 posted on 04/24/2006 12:02:46 AM PDT by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Geyer

Actually, biodiesel works better than I thought.

There was an old episode of Jeremy Clarkson's "Top Gear", where they put pure USED COOKING OIL from a french fry burner into an old Volvo diesel and ran the thing around a track. They had to add a cup of white gas to the tank first, but the thing kept on going and going and going.

The Economist has an article in this week's edition about this. It claims that bio-diesel becomes an economical alternative when oil hits about $80.00 per barrel.


39 posted on 04/24/2006 1:28:24 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: quantim

It's actually their 'offspring' that we're dealing with now, lol.

Real greenies wouldn't have offspring.


40 posted on 04/24/2006 1:40:45 AM PDT by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson