Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Josh Bolten Rescue the Bush Presidency?
Time ^ | April 23 2006 | MIKE ALLEN

Posted on 04/23/2006 1:26:49 AM PDT by jmc1969

Friends and colleagues of Bolten told Time about an informal, five-point "recovery plan" for Bush.

1. Deploy Guns and Badges

This is an unabashed play to members of the conservative base who are worried about illegal immigration. The White House plans to seek more funding for an extremely visible enforcement crackdown at the Mexican border, including a beefed-up force of agents patrolling on all-terrain vehicles.

2. Make Wall Street Happy

In an effort to curry favor with dispirited Bush backers in the investment world, the Administration will focus on two tax measures already in the legislative pipeline—extensions of the rate cuts for stock dividends and capital gains.

3. Brag More

With gas prices a heavy drain on Bush's popularity, his aides want to trumpet the lofty stock market and stable inflation and interest rates. They also plan to highlight any glimmer of success in Iraq, especially the formation of a new government.

4. Reclaim Security Credibility.

This is the riskiest, and potentially most consequential, element of the plan, keyed to the vow by Iran to continue its nuclear program despite the opposition of several major world powers. Presidential advisers believe that by putting pressure on Iran, Bush may be able to rehabilitate himself on national security, a core strength that has been compromised by a discouraging outlook in Iraq. "In the face of the Iranian menace, the Democrats will lose," said a Republican frequently consulted by the White House. However, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll, found that 54% of respondents did not trust Bush to "make the right decision about whether we should go to war with Iran."

5. Court The Press

His first move, working with counselor Dan Bartlett, was to offer the press secretary job to Tony Snow of Fox News radio and television.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: joshbolten; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2006 1:26:51 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Throw out #5, and you're there. The press will always hate Bush.


2 posted on 04/23/2006 1:31:37 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Ignore the Drive-by Media. Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Mike Allen, and the rest of his leftist buddies, are doing their very best to make people believe that if the President doesn't respond to their bogus Polling numbers, The President is doomed.

Stay the Course and ignore the MSM is the key to success, anything else is a recipe for disaster

3 posted on 04/23/2006 1:35:19 AM PDT by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Agreed. But if they don't get an aggressive, forceful Press Sec'y the PUBLIC likes, the press will eat W for breakfast.

What's needed is a strong male press secretary. People don't seem to notice that one thing the press worms love is a strong woman they can spit their bile at--it makes these "liberals" feel macho to trash a Republican woman, in a weird way: "See? I've got cojones, even if I am a feminist, I can still trash women, they don't scare me!" (In fact, liberal men I've encountered are really, really afraid of strong women, while we conservative men love 'em.) A Rumsfeld type male who has a history of accomplishment and/OR someone who isn't afraid to combat the press without looking like he's starting a fight but is defending a wronged President is just what's needed. In fact, the outgoing guy did precisely one right thing when he got David Gregory to reveal what a jackass he is when he threw a snit. We need to have these reporters revealed for what they are so they're afraid to get into it that way.

4 posted on 04/23/2006 1:39:00 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (By 2004, annual inflow of foreign-born persons was down 24% from its all-time high in 2000--PEW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Gotta love the MSM. If they say the Administration needs "saving" enough times, maybe they can make everyone think it's in horrid disarray. They dream up the "problem" and then challenge President Bush and Company to "solve" it.

Shameless. All this because they think -- good God -- Al Gore would have made a better President?

Even my liberal friends don't buy that.


5 posted on 04/23/2006 1:39:15 AM PDT by JennysCool (Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Fire any press spinners, and speak directly to the people, when finished, listen. Compare their lists of wants, with the constitution. Ask Clarence Thomas which things to do to get the country back under the rule of law.............. Do them.


6 posted on 04/23/2006 1:41:36 AM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

"Stay the Course and ignore the MSM is the key to success, anything else is a recipe for disaster"

Agreed. Anyone who wants to do political good in the world should pick up the paper every day and make sure the MSM is saying bad things about him/her. If they are saying good things, you've obviously gotten off track.

The MSM is one of the last outposts of communism, pure and simple. The Teachers Unions also. The Universities, well, that's obvious. We must continue to stand on guard against Communism.


7 posted on 04/23/2006 2:21:26 AM PDT by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Definitely brag more. It always worked for the Clinton's!!!!!!
8 posted on 04/23/2006 2:29:39 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

How about "Do the right think, and screw the polls"?

The right thing would, of course, include securing the borders, cutting taxes and taking out Iran nuke capabilities.


9 posted on 04/23/2006 2:33:29 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

There's only one person on the planet that can rescue the Bush Presidency and that is George W. Bush.


10 posted on 04/23/2006 3:24:15 AM PDT by Beckwith (The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Yes. If Bush stuck to business, secured the borders, brought down gas prices, and stood up to the MSM, the Republicans would become the majority party for a generation.


11 posted on 04/23/2006 3:26:09 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: jmc1969
How about CUTTING SPENDING Bush!

He is such a spending machine that he makes Clinton look like a conservative.

Courting the press is just putting lipstick on a pig.
13 posted on 04/23/2006 3:55:42 AM PDT by liliesgrandpa (The Republican Party simply can't do anything without that critical 100-seat Senate majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969; Admin Moderator
This article is not excerpted, it is edited. The "points" from near the end of the article are truncated and edited.

If that's OK vis-a-vis FR policy, then please disregard this obervation, otherwise, I would request that for accuracy sake, please replace the edited content with actual excerpting, or, place a note pointing out that the content is edited from the original.

I'm not trying to be a fussbudget (I've never left a comment like this in my several years here!), but I worry that in addition to people reading something they think is an actual excerpt from the article (and thus NOT clicking to read the actual article, and seeing very much different text), there might very well be some liability exposure via Time Magazine getting huffy over their article being "rewritten and published."

Note: I am not a lawyer, but I've paid enough thousands to 'em over the years that I've learned to be very wary of invoking risk.

14 posted on 04/23/2006 4:05:36 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe

Fussbudget.

Kidding!


15 posted on 04/23/2006 4:09:03 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

How about "Do the right think, and screw the polls"?

What was the name of that movie from a few years ago, where (I think I'm remembering this right), a guy from a nuthouse ends up writing ad copy that blows the competition out of the water. They are all driving themselves nuts trying to figure out his secret, but they can't, even when he explains it to them!

His ad copy consists of stuff like, "Volvo -- boxy, but good" -- and it sells like hotcakes!

He tells the other guys that all he does is tell the truth, without embellishing anything. They don't believe it -- they can't believe it -- because the "moral core" of their being consists of trying to come up with the right BS to convince people that they're "sincere."

I'm sure I'm forgetting major bits of the movie (hell, I already forgot the name -- and, the actors names too! -- so I'm off to a great start in that department!) But the point is, sometimes it's best to just BE a straight-shooter, rather than hiring focus groups and pollsters and MR wonks and statisticians to have a mega-pow-wow to figure out the best way to LOOK like a "straight-shooter".

Anyway, your post reminded me of that film; seemed like you were making the same point.

PS: After I'd hit the Preview button, I think I remembered the name of the actor who played the honest adman. I think it was Dudley Moore. But, I might be wrong, and I still can't remember the name of the movie! Maybe someone else knows the title?

16 posted on 04/23/2006 4:18:50 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

The real question is whether this story can rescue Time Magazine.


17 posted on 04/23/2006 4:18:55 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Well actually you bring up an interesting point. Both Time and the President need a Total Perception Makeover.


18 posted on 04/23/2006 4:32:29 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Bush's only problem is that people see him for who he is. Look, the democrats are idiots, but Bush has alienated a lot of people who should be his supporters. Most of his programs are simply unsupportable.

His spending is astronomic. His support of the Education Cabal is simply unacceptable. His view of our borders verges on... well I'll leave that to the reader. I simply cannot support the man any longer. What shred of credibility he had on the war has finally been eclipsed by his surrender of our sovereignty.

I've had my fill.


19 posted on 04/23/2006 4:38:08 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
liberal men I've encountered are really, really afraid of strong women, while we conservative men love 'em.

I think libs define "strong woman" differently than we do. To them, a strong woman is one who wears Birkenstocks but no bra, that regularly goes to protests, and who "isn't afraid to speak truth to power", which really just means criticizing conservatives in harsh terms.

To us, a strong woman means someone who is stable, capable of loving relationships, who understands the importance of women in society as mothers, spouses, and caregivers, and who doesn't give a damn what liberal "feminists" think.

20 posted on 04/23/2006 4:57:07 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson