Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: n-tres-ted
I don't know what he's doing here, but direct talks by the US with Iran are a very bad idea. It's very likely Iran would just use direct talks as an opportunity to issue a stream of popaganda statments that would be widely distributed by the Treason Media. Direct talks would be just another stalling tactic by Iran while they continue work on Uranium enrichment.

I can visualize the stream of propaganda that Iran would feed to our Treason Media, all in an attempt to make Bush the issue rather than Iran's diabolical nuclear program: a steady stream of slick propaganda statements such as "we only want the peaceful use of nuclear energy which America wants to take from us", and "Bush and America are the agressors here who want to invade and occupy Iran just like Iraq", etc., etc. The Treason Media would of course just love all this BS and would then spew out this stream of Iranian propaganda as if it has the same high credibility as statements by the Bush Administration about Iran.

The administration is on the right track today and should stay on that track: reject all direct talks with Iran and just say that we're on the same page with the EU and direct negotations with the US would produce exactly the same results as negotations by Europe. Then add that the lack of negotiated results is entirely because Iran refuses to halt its uranium enrichment program, which is the key step towards the grave threat of a nuclear-armed Iran.

11 posted on 04/18/2006 10:56:15 AM PDT by carl in alaska ("You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed." - Mt 24:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: carl in alaska

The president says he wants a negotiated deal with Iran, if possible, meaning they agree to an inspected back-off from their nuclear weapons aspirations. I believe the president in that regard. At the same time, the Iranian dealings with the Europeans have been nothing but stalling and propaganda. Question in my mind is whether Iran's leadership may decide to back off for the time being, hoping for Dems or a weaker Republican in the White House a few years down the line.


15 posted on 04/18/2006 11:07:21 AM PDT by n-tres-ted (Remember November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson