Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Plus, and this is very important and gets to the heart of the matter, the drug legalization people don't really want the government to remove the heavy hand of coercion from their necks ~ nosirreebob ~ they want it lifted up and placed on the rest of us to keep us from protecting ourselves against them.

This resembles English in some vague way.

Can you please explain how you need protection from Rush Limbaugh, Brett Favre, Betty Ford and a host of other famous, productive addicts whose addiction often becomse a criminal matter?

157 posted on 04/19/2006 1:20:19 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye
Rush Limbaugh was addicted to a prescription medicine that is otherwise "controlled".

It's not like he went looking for that particular problem.

However, in the absence of some kind of government control on this stuff, we'd all have to provide our own protection against druggies.

At the moment, because of government control, you are protected from private individuals having to protect themselves.

159 posted on 04/19/2006 2:37:22 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson