Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Californiajones
Observing the fallout upon our society because of the widespread belief in evolution is not logical fallacy, it is cultural discernment.

You have yet to demonstrate that acceptance of evolution is responsible for any such "fallout", or that it is a logical fallacy. Moreover, you are appealing to the consequences, which is a logical fallacy.

Darwinism, along with its evil twin, Marxism,

You have also not demonstrated a link between the theory of evolution and Marxism.

That is my staunch objection to EvoThink -- and my puzzlement as to how Evos could be conservative.

Your objection, and your puzzlement, is likely a result of your complete failure to understand what evolution is, or to accept that it is not what you claim. You have yet to demonstrate that any of your claims regarding social or political implications of the theory of evolution are factual, despite being asked repeatedly to do so.
312 posted on 04/15/2006 8:53:42 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
""You have yet to demonstrate that any of your claims regarding social or political implications of the theory of evolution are factual, despite being asked repeatedly to do so.""

I suppose I could write a treatise on why Evos can't see the forest for the trees.
316 posted on 04/15/2006 9:09:08 PM PDT by Californiajones ("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson