[ClearCase_guy]

I read this book many years ago. I considered it staggering in it's stupidity. Also, it's polical agenda is not subtle. Men suck.

[orionblamblam]

> Men suck.

(Mandatory "Well, in San Francisco" joke hereby redacted)

[Malesherbes]

You are right. The book is only "acclaimed" by feminazis. It is part of their agenda.

[swain_forkbeard]

"I read this book many years ago."

Exactly.

[Hildy]

I believe it was also made into a movie that nobody went to see.

[Tokra]

I read this book many years ago. I considered it staggering in it's stupidity. Also, it's polical agenda is not subtle. Men suck.

You mean like most sitcoms and commercials? These shows and commercials that make adult males look like total morons are getting out of hand.Makes me long for the days of "Father Knows Best".

Nowdays - it's more like "Father Doesn't Know Diddly-Squat".

[wildbill]

You are absolutely right. The message, pounded over and over again, is that all men are misogynists who oppress women.

If a man wrote a similar book about women and mommyism he'd be run out of town on a rail.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

If it should be banned, it should be banned because of its anti-male agenda, simply for the fact that were the sexes reversed in this story, Atwood would be one of the first demanding that it be banned.