Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comment: 'Handmaid's Tale' characterized unfairly by its opponents [San Antonio]
San Antonio Express-News ^ | 12 April 2006 | Margaret Atwood

Posted on 04/12/2006 11:44:39 AM PDT by Racehorse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: ClearCase_guy

I believe it was also made into a movie that nobody went to see.


21 posted on 04/12/2006 12:14:49 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I was actually in the crowd of people who didn't go see it.


22 posted on 04/12/2006 12:15:51 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Foxfire4

You ever read this one? Sounds like one of those bad Tepper or Kingsolver screeds.

}:-)4


23 posted on 04/12/2006 12:16:22 PM PDT by Moose4 (Please don't call me "white trash." I prefer "Caucasian recyclable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jibaholic

The issue is not about 'banning' the novel, it's about whether or not it should be REQUIRED reading or even RECOMMENDED reading (presumably it would be one or the other, probably the former, if it's included on the syllabus of an AP course). Leftist trash always gets into a lather about any attempt to review a syllabus, yet they would never accept that all the good/great conservative books are 'banned' if they are not included on some course syllabus.


24 posted on 04/12/2006 12:16:39 PM PDT by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; All
ROFLMAO!!! GET THIS ONE (nah-not Anti Christian in the least!) Here's are two descriptions of the story from imdb:

1)Set in a Fascistic future America, The Handmaid's Tale tells the story of Kate, a handmaid. In this America, the religious right has taken over and gone hog-wild. Kate is a criminal, guilty of the crime of trying to escape from the US, and is sentenced to become a Handmaid. The job of a Handmaid is to bear the children of the man to whom she is assigned. After ruthless group training by Serena Joy in the proper way to behave, Kate is assigned as Handmaid to the Commander. Kate is attracted to Nick, the Commander's chauffeur. At the same time, a resistance movement begins to challenge the regime.

2) Following a coup, America is a country still at war with itself and ruled by a repressive Bible-inspired regime. Past pollution means only 1% of women can bear children, and anyone committing a crime and found to be a potential mother is put into an institution run by 'Aunt Lydia' to be indoctrinated ready for this. One such is Kate, who then goes on to Fred, a high-up in the security forces, to attempt to procreate. Fred's wife Serena is jealous and vicious, and the State's grip seems to be tightening. But Kate still has her own mind, and is finding that some other people are prepared to resist.

25 posted on 04/12/2006 12:19:25 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
I don't know... I had a regular lolocaust when I saw Battlefield Earth. Silly Scientologists.
26 posted on 04/12/2006 12:24:12 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
If it reads anything like the movie, I would not have finished it anyway.

I have not read the book or seen the movie.
It might have been helpful to tell us why you feel that way...

27 posted on 04/12/2006 12:28:16 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
They also were busy exterminating "The children of Ham", commonly known as African-Americans.
28 posted on 04/12/2006 12:29:38 PM PDT by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

The novel is a colossal, hate-filled bore, IMHO. Let the kiddies read it and make up their own minds.


29 posted on 04/12/2006 12:31:16 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

"I think there are many better choices."

I agree!! What ever happened to teaching the classics, i.e., Shakespeare, Dickens, Bronte, Austen, Hardy, Eliot?? These are more suited to an AP English class than any of the 20th Century crapola that tries to pass itself off as great literature!


30 posted on 04/12/2006 12:33:51 PM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
I put nothing into my book that human beings have not already done.

Wow, she sure sets a high standard of what should go in a book used in schools. /src

I find it mind boggling that she would even think that was a good argument to justify the contents.
31 posted on 04/12/2006 12:33:59 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
I read this book a very long time ago and remember it only for the fact that it was very 'dark' and had little redeeming social value. It wasn't even good entertainment unless you were a pretty twisted type.

As far as being offered to AP classes, I agree with others on the thread--there are much better examples of good literature out there. This book qualifies as tripe.

32 posted on 04/12/2006 12:41:18 PM PDT by Tarheel (from what was North Carolina and is now North Mexolina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I rented the movie and enjoyed it. (because it had nudity)


33 posted on 04/12/2006 12:41:21 PM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
It was a 1990 theatrical release that bombed so badly in theaters that it was pulled after less than a week. It is a laughably bad screed against conservatives and religion pretending to be science fiction. It is hateful, heavy-handed, and horribly written. That said, I think it should be available to all students of bad writing and juvenile propaganda.

Box Office Mojo: The Handmaid's Tale Cinc Week of March 9, 1990 Gross sales: $738,578 - ranking: 117 - Per Theater: $6,312 (Its first and last week it made $738,000 gross)

It's worth 99 cents at a flea market, a six pack, and a few hours to laugh at one of the worst feminist rants in the past 25 years.

34 posted on 04/12/2006 12:42:27 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

I would submit that Steven King's "The Stand" has far more literary and political relevance than "The Handmaid's Tale".


35 posted on 04/12/2006 12:43:49 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

This has nothing to do with "free speech." No one is saying that she can't publish this tripe. No one is saying that anyone who wants to read this tripe can't.
Morons.


36 posted on 04/12/2006 12:52:52 PM PDT by PalestrinaGal0317 (Cowards cut and run, Marines never do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

If it reads anything like the movie, I would not have finished it anyway.

I have not read the book or seen the movie. It might have been helpful to tell us why you feel that way...

I flipped the remote about half way through the movie.  It was a bore.

I made the comment following the open letter to indicate I have no personal basis from which to criticize the novel or Atwood.  That Atwood took the time to write an open letter concerning a dead issue I found highly interesting.  I thought others would find it similarly interesting.

37 posted on 04/12/2006 12:58:16 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
Incredibly overrated novel. I doubt any male would like its misandry, and I'd second-guess any woman who counts it among her favorite novels.

This is just more "Let's Read Banned Books!" sanctimony from schoolmarmish librarian-types.

38 posted on 04/12/2006 12:59:01 PM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

What the flock is that?! Sounds like some dadgum romance novel but written by a lesbian!


39 posted on 04/12/2006 1:04:34 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Even as a mere sci-fi dystopia, it still sucks. It's just not good.

I keep getting this book confused in my mind with P.D. James, "The Children of Men," which also sucked, but not as bad as Atwood's Oreck of a novel.

40 posted on 04/12/2006 1:07:48 PM PDT by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 72-76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson