There are two popular whizbangs. One is God. One is happenstance. I don't see one as being any more scientific than the other.
Here's my opinion about how scientific education should operate. I'm not for taking a Bible into science class. I don't even particularly care if ID is taught as a specific discipline (Behe's ideas, for example). I'd be more than satisfied if evolution was taught as a theory, and if five minutes were spent at the beginning of the semester explaining that science says NOTHING one way or another about God's existence. Therefore, maybe the universe, its laws, its lifeforms couldn't exist without a deity that created them. Maybe it could.
If that was done, few people of faith would concern themselves with this issue. The internet, private schools, and homeschooling are breaking the evolutionist monopoly, one way or the other. But even my modest suggestion would bring down the wrath of the hardcore evolutionists, the ACLU, and the arrogant federal judiciary. We'd be told that to even mention the possibility of God having anything to do with life or the universe would be outrageous. We'd be told that even a single sentence treating evolution as anything other than the single most established fact in the history of the world would be a "constitutional violation".
And so the controversy continues.