Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer: Bush Didn't Direct Libby to Leak
AP ^ | 08 April 2006 | JENNIFER LOVEN

Posted on 04/08/2006 6:09:44 PM PDT by redlenses

WASHINGTON

President Bush declassified sensitive intelligence in 2003 and authorized its public disclosure to rebut Iraq war critics, but he did not specifically direct that Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, be the one to disseminate the information, an attorney knowledgeable about the case said Saturday.

Bush merely instructed Cheney to "get it out" and left the details to him, said the lawyer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case for the White House. The vice president chose Libby and communicated the president's wishes to his then-top aide, the lawyer said.

It is not known when the conversation between Bush and Cheney took place. The White House has declined to provide the date when the president used his authority to declassify the portions of the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, a classified document that detailed the intelligence community's conclusions about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

The new information about Bush and Cheney's roles came as the president's aides have scrambled to defuse the political fallout from a court filing Wednesday by the prosecutors in the complex, ongoing investigation into whether the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame was disclosed to discredit her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, an Iraq war critic.

Wilson had accused the administration of twisting prewar intelligence to exaggerate the weapons threat in Iraq.

Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald said in the filing that Libby testified before a grand jury that he was authorized by Bush, through Cheney, to leak information from the intelligence estimate.

Libby faces trial, likely in January, on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice for allegedly lying to the grand jury and investigators about what he told reporters about Plame.

Fitzgerald did not say in the filing that Cheney authorized Libby to leak Plame's identity, and Bush is not accused of doing anything illegal.

Fitzgerald's aim with the filing was to counter Libby's defense that he innocently forgot about conversations he may have had with reporters about Plame by showing that the White House's concern about the war criticism was so consuming it would be difficult to forget.

But by suggesting that the leak of Plame's name may have been set in motion by the president, however indirectly, the documents reverberated much more broadly. Democrats unleashed a storm of criticism against Bush, saying he appeared to have misused the declassification process for political gain.

On Friday, the White House argued there is an important different between disclosing sensitive information to further a public debate and leaking classified information that compromises national security. But the attorney said Saturday the president's instructions were not as specific as it might seem from both Fitzgerald's description of Libby's testimony and news accounts of it.

Because Bush declassified the intelligence document, the White House does not view Libby's conversations about it as a leak. But that determination is difficult to make without knowing precisely when Bush decided to declassify the information.

Libby passed the information about the document to New York Times reporter Judith Miller on July 8, 2003. It was 10 days later, on July 18, when the same portions of the document that Libby discussed with Miller were released publicly.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/08/2006 6:09:46 PM PDT by redlenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redlenses
So it is OK for Carter to leak the Stealth fighter so the dummies think that everyone else is as dumb as them?
2 posted on 04/08/2006 6:14:45 PM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

bump


3 posted on 04/08/2006 6:21:04 PM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

PING...

I heard this story on Fox News tonight..interesting.


4 posted on 04/08/2006 6:22:50 PM PDT by Txsleuth (~~~~~~FREEPATHON TIME~~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Now this sounds like my President! :)


5 posted on 04/08/2006 6:24:12 PM PDT by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
If President Bush actually authorized the disclosure then the Prosecutor does not have a case.

However, I believe that the leaker all along was Wilson himself to make himself and his wife victims and Libs loves victims...


6 posted on 04/08/2006 6:26:33 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald said in the filing that Libby testified before a grand jury that he was authorized by Bush, through Cheney, to leak information from the intelligence estimate.

Fitzzzzzz is a jackass if he made the statement that it was a leak. The President or VP can not be accused of a leak. They have the Constitutional Authority to disclose any material including classified. Also the President or VP has the authority to direct any employee to dislcose any material and is once again not a leak. This proves that Fitzzzzzz is a stone nut.

7 posted on 04/08/2006 6:29:59 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
Bush Didn't Direct Libby to Leak

Since no one has been charged with a leak in this case, including Libby, I'm starting to think there never has been a "leak." If Bush directed someone to leak something, it must have been REALLY subtle.

8 posted on 04/08/2006 6:33:18 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Fritz is a jackass who is out to get Bush at all cost and who the media has sainted. Meanwhile, Starr went out of his way to be fair and was destroyed by the media.


9 posted on 04/08/2006 6:34:42 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Yes, merely comparing the drastic differences in MSM treatment of Fitz-turd with MSM treatment of Starr is enough to show the stunning bias and dishonesty of so much of the MSM.


10 posted on 04/08/2006 6:37:11 PM PDT by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Not just the difference between Starr and Fitzgerald, but look at the difference the MSM treatment of Kathleen Wiley or Paula Jones and Valerie Plame. It would be an interesting case study to compare and contrast the reporting of key figures in all these scandals. It would blow the lid off of any claim of unbias reporting by the MSM.


11 posted on 04/08/2006 6:43:48 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stevem
Since it has never been determined that Plame was covert I am at a loss to figure out what the hell is going on!

And don't pardon me! *&$#&

12 posted on 04/08/2006 6:47:38 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICA WOULD NOT BE THE LAND OF THE FREE IF IT WERE NOT ALSO THE HOME OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Ping.


13 posted on 04/08/2006 6:59:22 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Totally agree on this one. If she wasn't covert why have they allowed themselves to be punished on the issue for two years now?

I don't get it.

The Wilsons were in a conspiracy to undermine the war here.


14 posted on 04/08/2006 7:12:29 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: defconw

This story is just so NOT what the dems and MSM are making it out to be...

BUT, since Congress is out for 2 weeks, it will be the main topic until something knocks it off the radar..

However, I do believe the immigration subject will continue because so many protests are planned in the next month.


15 posted on 04/08/2006 7:48:01 PM PDT by Txsleuth (~~~~~~FREEPATHON TIME~~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Fitz rolled the dice for a BIG job in the next Dem administration???


16 posted on 04/08/2006 8:15:27 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
Bush merely instructed Cheney to "get it out" and left the details to him...

So maybe the Dems will go after Cheney, and get him to resign, and Condi will be the VP, and uhhhhh...then again, maybe they won't go after Cheney.

17 posted on 04/08/2006 8:16:59 PM PDT by LZ_Bayonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet

This is all a smokescreen by the Dems to minimize the leaking of the NSA program.


18 posted on 04/08/2006 8:30:08 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

Fitzgerald going for the "Lawrence Walsh gotta get somebody" award?


19 posted on 04/09/2006 6:35:17 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson